Rev Matching Without Ford Performance Tune?

[fuesting]

True, and we're not all Speed Devil's, I have to keep that in mind

3 kids in hockey and 18K miles a year generally forces me to drive as efficient as possible. I have other rides to have fun in.

Sponsored

 

[lethaljake]

Order a tune from Lethal and use 93 until you hit your $1000 threshold and then go back to regular?

@lethaljake , tune adjusts for 87, right?

No sir. These calibrations require premium grade fuel only. No 87 unforuntely.

 

[CPL_Rabbit]

And now, it looks like you can't even get Rev Match in the ProCal tune. Apparently for CARB certification.

I'm also one that just wants the rev match for a bit of QOL bonus. I have no need for a power boost, especially with a premium gas requirement.

 

[Hemisfear]

Use the pedal on the right.

You beat me to it! lol
Here and I wanted the computer rev matching removed from my Focus SVT & ST or I could heel toe...

 

[Hemisfear]

For my part, my Bronco wasn't expensive, I paid cash for it, and it's not the vehicle I'd buy to hot rod around in. I know some people like having more power and that's cool, but it's not my thing.

Damn, up here you'd pay extra with cash! My dealer only allowed $50k down.
I went less than that with my 4% rate, it made me money with a loan and the rest into investments...

 

[CalvinT]

I don't understand this fixation with rev matching. It's not the same as double clutch shifting, which makes a difference with non-syncromesh transmissions. I learned to drive with a manual in 1965 and have been driving manual transmissions ever since. I've never known anyone who used rev matching.

I can see how it can save some wear and tear on the clutch if you can match engine speed to transmission input shaft before releasing the clutch. I would enable rev matching if the computer did it for me for that reason. Otherwise you need to memorize your engine speeds for each gear.

Plus if you think about it. Cars with automatic transmissions don't rev match.

My take? If it makes you feel like you're doing something, go for it. But to me it's a waste of effort. Considering how long a clutch lasts if driven properly, it doesn't make sense.

 

[DDraht]

We don't have 93 or even 91 Octane here, Ford Performance agreed it would be ok to run on 90.

To: Magyar, Tom (T.) <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Perf Calibration M-9603-B23

Correct. It will learn that octane. He won’t see the full advertised power gains. Air/oil separators are always a good idea on EcoBoost engines.


From: Magyar, Tom (T.) <[email protected]>

Subject: FW: Perf Calibration M-9603-B23

from an official FORD Performance standpoint is He ok to run 90 octane if that’s all He can get in Alaska? I would think the oil/air separators would help his cause in this area.

 

[CPL_Rabbit]

I don't understand this fixation with rev matching. It's not the same as double clutch shifting, which makes a difference with non-syncromesh transmissions. I learned to drive with a manual in 1965 and have been driving manual transmissions ever since. I've never known anyone who used rev matching.

I can see how it can save some wear and tear on the clutch if you can match engine speed to transmission input shaft before releasing the clutch. I would enable rev matching if the computer did it for me for that reason. Otherwise you need to memorize your engine speeds for each gear.

Plus if you think about it. Cars with automatic transmissions don't rev match.

My take? If it makes you feel like you're doing something, go for it. But to me it's a waste of effort. Considering how long a clutch lasts if driven properly, it doesn't make sense.

I don't understand the point of responding to this thread with "have you considered NOT using rev match?".

The question is whether there's some way to get rev match without the tune. Now that it's not even available there, the question is more valid for anyone that wants to have it.

 

[fuesting]

I don't understand the point of responding to this thread with "have you considered NOT using rev match?".

The question is whether there's some way to get rev match without the tune. Now that it's not even available there, the question is more valid for anyone that wants to have it.

Thank you for this.

Oh CARB how I loathe you...

 

[Green/22/Bronco]

Plus if you think about it. Cars with automatic transmissions don't rev match.

Sure they do,

 

[CalvinT]

How? The engine speed doesn't change until the transmission has shifted. Rev matching means the engine speed changes before the next gear is engaged. Automatic transmissions don't do that.

 

[GI_Jo_Nathan]

How? The engine speed doesn't change until the transmission has shifted. Rev matching means the engine speed changes before the next gear is engaged. Automatic transmissions don't do that.

It's irrelevant anyways. The torque converter on an automatic makes up the difference. The clutch and drivetrain just takes the abuse from not rev-matching.

 

[CalvinT]

It's irrelevant anyways. The torque converter on an automatic makes up the difference. The clutch and drivetrain just takes the abuse from not rev-matching.

I agree. And you said it better than I did.

Sponsored