Production Mach E spied!!
https://www.macheforum.com/site/thr...c-suv-spied-in-production-guise-first-look.34
https://www.macheforum.com/site/thr...c-suv-spied-in-production-guise-first-look.34
Sponsored
Sponsored
please don't let that be a pony they are hiding on the front fascia.
Agreed. They already went too far with the tri bar taillights... if they put a pony on it, I have little faith left in Ford
OP
OP
- Thread starter
- #185
I honestly think it looks good. I think Ford segmenting their SUV’s into a range of on and off-road capability is genius. I know people get upset about the “lineage of the mustang” but that lineage included an awful lot of dogshit between 1974-2014. I have no problems with this as it seems to actually have a pretty cool premise and execution.
- First Name
- Brad
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2019
- Threads
- 21
- Messages
- 1,486
- Reaction score
- 4,611
- Location
- Charleston
- Vehicle(s)
- 2021 Ford Bronco - 4 Door Badlands
- Your Bronco Model
- Badlands
This whole pony debacle is silly in my opinion. If you like the car would it really keep you from buying it? If you don’t like it then will it keep you from buying a mustang?
Sponsored
Don't you think this is just an evolutionary fait accompli? I think if Ford transitioned out of the auto business and into bicycles, there would be a "Mustang" model. Same with EVs.
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2019
- Threads
- 13
- Messages
- 205
- Reaction score
- 388
- Location
- West Virginia
- Vehicle(s)
- Full size GM SUV
- Your Bronco Model
- Base
I agree. Hopefully it looks better without the camo!
Looks pretty slick from rear side angle, the front is wait and see. Should be no question that it jumps to the top of the heap of American made plugins.
Last edited:
- First Name
- Nick
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2019
- Threads
- 0
- Messages
- 29
- Reaction score
- 40
- Location
- Westchester County, New York
- Vehicle(s)
- Ford Explorer
- Your Bronco Model
- Base
Oh please, stop being so dramatic. This model is a game changer for this brand. It's not half-assed and will not tarnish the Mustang name.
- First Name
- Jim
- Joined
- May 25, 2017
- Threads
- 45
- Messages
- 1,311
- Reaction score
- 1,299
- Location
- jackson nj
- Vehicle(s)
- 59 Bird, 70, 74, 78, 79 Broncos, 84 LTD 331 w/Vortech, 86 Capri 5.0 turbo, 14 Stang GT, 17 Fusion Sport
- Your Bronco Model
- Undecided
The only question is how much it will tarnish the mustang image.
The only place to go from having the most iconic vehicle name/image on the planet, is down.
They made the front of the mustang look exactly like the fusion in 15, to the point is was difficult
to tell exactly from a bit far off, front view really which car was coming at you. It's a shame this
new SUV won't strand on it's own with a new look.
Sponsored
OP
OP
In your opinion, what are the 2 good ones and the 4 mediocre-dogshit ones? I'd place it at 4-2 if anything, or maybe 4.5 and 1.5. and simply put the Mustang II was more of the Mustang holding to it's roots with the times. Only in hindsight was it a shitty car for what the mustang represents, and most of the prior owners of them I know fondly remember that little POS.
OP
OP
- Thread starter
- #195
1st gen and 6th gen are amazing. 5th gen is ok for the later years, 3rd gen ok as a mod vehicle, 2nd and 4th gen absolutely suck.
Sponsored
