If you could only pick 1..

[Tdifonzo]

Those people don't off road.

True, but that's kind of my point. The majority of people who want the Sasquatch package just like the look and don't need all the extras. If you're going to actually use it for what it's for then that should 100% be a priority above the 2.7L or 12" screen.

Sponsored

 

[Washbjj88]

For me it depends what I start with. If its a 4 door badlands then the 2.7. Pretty much any other trim its Sasquatch package. Wildtrak and FE leave only one option to add, high package(12" screen).

i'm hoping to get a 4 door Badlands. auto and hard top first priority. if budget allows upgrade to 2.7 and last add the high package. I expect this to push 52k MSRP so I might drop down to 4 door Black diamond with auto, hardtop and Sasquatch.

I don't think i would change my priorities for a 2 door but with kids that's not an option. If you have another idea let me know. Until we get pricing i'm undecided.

 

[RG7]

If we're talking about a theoretical base model then Sasquatch. Couldn't care less about the 12" screen. 2.7 would be really nice to have but if I absolutely had to choose I want the best running gear I can get from the factory, the 2.3 would be sufficient, even more so with a tune after warranty expires.

Edit: sp

 

[LSU Jonno]

If you were forced to chose between the following:
1. 2.7 V6
2. High package with 12” screen
3. Sasquatch

which would you chose? For arguments sake, have your build ready to go, but can only fit one more “upgrade” in your budget. Which one is it and why?

In this situation, I'd probably be going with the Badlands trim (because I couldn't afford a Wildtrak) and trying to decide between these options. So I'd pick #2, high package with 12" screen. Rationale:

• I'd plan to get a tune on my 2.3 to increase power down the line when I could afford it (I'm getting a 4 door so I'm concerned with 2.3 power. If it turns out to be plenty power with 2.3 then I'll skip tune)
• I'm already getting the vast majority of Sasquatch with badlands. I'd actually prefer 33" AT tires vs 35" MT tires due to road noise anyway.
• I really want all of the sync/electronic integration to be stock. Prefer not to mess with that aftermarket.

 

[foreWard]

Edited to create a poll.

 

[FourHorses]

Sasquatch unless it is a badlands trim. Then the 2.7.

 

[foreWard]

In this situation, I'd probably be going with the Badlands trim (because I couldn't afford a Wildtrak) and trying to decide between these options. So I'd pick #2, high package with 12" screen. Rationale:

• I'd plan to get a tune on my 2.3 to increase power down the line when I could afford it (I'm getting a 4 door so I'm concerned with 2.3 power. If it turns out to be plenty power with 2.3 then I'll skip tune)
• I'm already getting the vast majority of Sasquatch with badlands. I'd actually prefer 33" AT tires vs 35" MT tires due to road noise anyway.
• I really want all of the sync/electronic integration to be stock. Prefer not to mess with that aftermarket.

I’m in the exact same boat. Probably going badlands, and I like the standard ko2 33s. And I really want the 12” screen. (And B&O system if stand alone - don’t need the ACC of the lux pack). We will see if I can fork over more $$$ for the V6, because I feel like I will already be pushing lower $50s here....

 

[GotGOAT]

I voted Sasquatch but it really depends upon what model you are starting with.
For me, if it was. Badlands then I would prioritize the 2.7 over the Squatch.
For all of the models below the Badlands, I would Squatch first.
Full disclosure: both the 2.7 and Sasquatch are non-negotiable in my Bronco. If I need to go base and stick with the MIC roof, I’ll still have the 2.7 and Squatch.

 

[Jmgunn0124]

Good one!

12” for me. I don’t like to mess with the dash.

I’m fine tuning the 2.3 down the road.

I would prefer AT over MT tires.

 

[indio22]

None of the above? I'm likely going manual trans, so V6 is unfortunately not an option. I want 33" AT tires not 35s, so no Sasquatch. And if screen delete were an option I'd take it, so no 12" screen. If I had to chose on a different model though, likely would choose V6.

 

[bbqbronco]

I thought the screen was just 8" not 8.5". Every little bit counts though huh. Maybe it was a warmer day when you measured. ?

 

[Rayder]

2.7... and its not really the power issue. Quite frankly the power in the 2.3 Ranger is fantastic, in the smaller Bronco I'd imagine it's even better. That said I've had 2 trucks with the 2.7, and they have been virtually bulletproof. The 2.3 might be fine as well. But I just have no experience with it.

 

[TXRancher]

Since neither the 2.7L or Sasquatch are currently available with the Manual, I chose the 12" screen.

 

[Imissmy1996bronco]

For me it depends on what trim you're asking about. If it’s badlands, I’d go v6. Any other trim, and I’d go Sasquatch.

Here’s my reasoning, it is ridiculously easy to add power and torque to that 2.3 (not to mention tunes that let you keep warranty.). That being said, with the 4.7 gears, it should move pretty well even without a tune. (For goodness sake, the 2.3 has output on par with the 5.8 my 96 bronco had, add the deeper axle gears and a 10 speed auto, plus forced induction at altitude and this should be plenty of power). The Sasquatch package adds an iron 210mm front dif (compared to the aluminum 190mm unit that’s standard, same/similar unit to the ranger). It’s a lot harder to upgrade that unit or add front locker than it is to tune the 2.3.

Sponsored