SEND IT!
pls & thx.
pls & thx.
Sponsored
Cool story. Go ahead and design and manufacture a pair of Commercially/Industry rated and PE FEA shackles and I'll buy them.Yeah uh that means absolutely nothing. Rated lifting devices involves way more than FEA.
The fact that this was clearly designed to look good and then analyzed after the fact says it all.
I won’t argue that they’re not pretty- they are- but marketing these as an actual recovery component is a mistake. Thankfully no one who actually needs recovery gear is going to buy them, I just hope someone who is new to the game doesn’t have one fail and wind up hurt or worse.
This whole ‘PE FEA’ thing you seem to keep bragging about is only impressive to people who don’t know anything about engineering. And pretty much anyone can buy rated shackles from every 4x4 retailer in the world.Cool story. Go ahead and design and manufacture a pair of Commercially/Industry rated and PE FEA shackles and I'll buy them.
Okay, so... Some right, some assumed, and some wrong. That sums up your post. So, the bolt was changed out 40+ days ago for your vaunted 316 Stainless. The initial bolt choice was an off the shelf McMaster unit. This shackle deserved better, so it received better. The current bolt, which all shackles ship with, are the Grade A stuff. So, let's put that to bed. Over 200 of these 70,000# tensile strength bolts are already machined and snuggly wrapped in bubble wrap, awaiting install.This whole ‘PE FEA’ thing you seem to keep bragging about is only impressive to people who don’t know anything about engineering. And pretty much anyone can buy rated shackles from every 4x4 retailer in the world.
You clearly can manufacture nice product. While I find your naming choices a little over the top, the stuff you’re doing in interiors looks to be well executed. Your front plate mount is, in my opinion, the best one available by a mile. Unless someone does something better in the next three months I’ll be buying one.
The point Im getting at there is that I’m not trying to insult you; I just don’t think you’ve really considered your design choices very heavily. The whole appeal to authority thing is not going to help my case but… I am a PE. I design life safety structures and devices all the time. I understand what’s involved.
What you’ve decided to make and sell here is NOT a backup camera mount that looks nice; it’s a life safety device. The fact that you released the design before you (apparently) even had any strength data available is an indicator that you haven’t thought about it.
By advertising this product the way you are, you’re setting yourself up to get sued when one fails and hurts someone. I sincerely hope this NEVER happens, but If it does, you’re going to be in a tough spot.
Theres a couple of choices you’ve made for the sake of cosmetics that, from the standpoint of good engineering, are not great. Example: 7075 shackle body with an 18-8 bolt. Now I’m sure you picked that 18-8 because you’re not a metallurgist and figured ‘stainless is better, let’s do that. 316-L is crazy expensive, let’s just pick the cheapest stainless out there. 18-8 it is!!!’. But what you’ve done by pairing these materials in a product that is going to live outside is set up a galvanic couple with a potential around .5 ev. That’s really bad. What does that mean in the real world? It means these things are going to corrode. Anyone who lives in a wet environment is going to be unable to get their shackles off their bumper in short order. Did you even consider that? What about side loads on the shackle putting the bolt in bending? What about that neck you put in the bolt so the thread diameter could be small and make it look nice? What about the lack of ductility in 7075? What about the nice clean stress risers all over this thing? Did any of that occur to you or the PE you paid to do what I’m assuming is going to be a very simplistic analysis?
There’s a reason companies like factor55 sell hooks and shackle mounts which are proof loaded and properly rated, and don’t make their own shackles.