- Thread starter
- Banned
- #1
I think it would make a lot of decisions easier if we could see one simple race 2.3 vs 2.7 i would be intrested how it goes.
Sponsored
Just curious , ive swallowed the hook on the bronco for sure.Looking at the wrong vehicle, are we?
Looking at the wrong vehicle, are we?
Just having fun while avoiding my own morning responsibilities, lol.Just curious , ive swallowed the hook on the bronco for sure.
Not sure how they could make a direct comparison of those two engines in the same vehicle yet, but they're on the list of things my gastroenterologist says to avoid.Didn’t TFL do exactly this?
Yeah, I just went searching YouTube and they haven’t...Not sure how they could make a direct comparison of those two engines in the same vehicle yet, but they're on the list of things my gastroenterologist says to avoid.
2.3 for me as well hello 2022 1/2Not sure how they could make a direct comparison of those two engines in the same vehicle yet, but they're on the list of things my gastroenterologist says to avoid.
Somewhat relative, I wonder how many of the traditional reviewers are going to actually review the manual transmission? I'm sure the auto 2.3L will be quicker to 60mph, but I would like a professional off-road driver to review both and 2.3 vs 2.7 and whether or not they feel it's necessary.Yeah, I just went searching YouTube and they haven’t...
They did a 2.3 vs 2.7 but it was Ranger/F150... and then they did three F150s but none have the 2.3.
And I’m with your gastroenterologist on this. The reason I was legitimately asking if TFL did it is because I avoid their content at all costs... and I consume a lot of garbage media so my tolerance is pretty high.
I second this idea!I would just as soon have the 3.3L Ti-VCT non-turbo V6 as the base engine (as it is in the base F-150). Simpler, possibly more reliable over the long haul, doesn't have to spool up turbos to make reasonable torque.....