Interesting totally on topic note; this photo is an homage to a photo of Sophia Loren and Jayne Mansfield.
Ok, this one is the best so far! LOL
maybe I’m misreading your statement here? As a current and past owner of an F150, the Ranger is not built on the same platform.That can't be. The Ranger is the same size as an F-150 and in other pictures of the Bronco it is smaller than the F-150.
It's a sarcastic comment to all of the people who insist that the Ranger is the same size as the old F-150, even though they are 100000000% wrong.maybe I’m misreading your statement here? As a current and past owner of an F150, the Ranger is not built on the same platform.
So must be a regular cab F150 then.That’s good, because the ranger is tiny.
The fender flares for all non-Sasquatch models are the same size. So the base flares won't be smaller than the standard Badlands flares. The difference you would see would come down to the tire size. The 255/70/16s will be a little narrower and less tall than the 285/70/17s.BUT are they TOO BIG? Im thinking and hoping that the combination of a slightly smaller tire and reduced fender flares will make the necessary difference
While we are on topic, I had to learn the capital of all the countries in grade school. So in an effort to recall the different locales, my dad taught me about word association. For the country of Bulgaria the capital is Sofia. Well my dad emphasized that Sophia Loren had large "bulges" (I can still picture him making the hand gesture mimicking her endowment). So when I thought of Bulgaria just think of Sophia's "bulges".Int
Interesting totally on topic note; this photo is an homage to a photo of Sophia Loren and Jayne Mansfield.
Width without mirrors:Picture is a bit misleading bc the the badlands bronco is listed at 76 inches wide, but my lincoln aviator is 82 inches wide and i dont feel that it is a huge SUV
Trail sights for reference points and the front camera and tire cameras for the close-up work. Short of the old Econoline vans, nothing would come close to the visibility provided with those cameras.The comparison reveals how flat and level the Bronco's hood is, compared to the downward-sloping Ranger.
Forward visibility of terrain is going to suck. The 3rd-gen Tacoma has the same problem...
Flat hoods look awesome and butch but there is a price.
You post a picture of that ugly thing and your only takeaway about why anyone would drive it is about forward visibility? This thing was modeled after the guy from Scream.Good observation. There are worse. I honestly have no idea how anyone drivers something like this. The angle of view has to be 25 feet in front of the truck.
Not standing up the way they do in the four-door. But you could probably do it with the back seats down. The main problem is the doors are longer in the two-door. However you put them in, you'd want to make sure they don't bang against each other and damage themselves, particularly if you are off-roading.I am trying to figure out if it possible to put the 2-doors in the back of a 2-door, in the bag, whether they be flat, diagonal etc.
I asked on Twitter and Mr. Levine's response was "4-door".