Right there!!...I'm getting with the Squatch. Plus, when I take delivery I'd rather be overwhelmed than underwhelmed.
Monkey Bussness35's have business on paved roads. Plenty of business.
If the new Bronco looked like that, no matter how capable, I wouldn’t be buying it. Just saying
The LEGEND of go anywhere, do anything offroad, of ALL SUV's, doesn't use massive tires to do its job ... talk to some real overlanders before you equip your mall crawler
The Badlands with 33’s are still large and it’s very capable without 35’s. in my opinion most of the other models the tires just look out of proportion to the vehicle. Of course there is always aftermarket but Ford does put appropriate gearing for tires size.Is there a video or set of photos anywhere comparing a badlands to a badlands w/Sasquatch? This thread has me thinking maybe I don’t need the Sasquatch package.
Part of the “works” package at my local Ford dealer.the guy who does mine never complains....?
Yeah but when you lift a f150 6” like me, 35s actually look small and 37s would be better appearance wise, but I wheel the crap out of my truck and would have too many issues w/ 37s.I think my F150 has like 32s and they look big to me haha. I think 33’s will be perfect.
I would take a BOF lifted Flex with 3.5 ecoboost anyday.If the new Bronco looked like that, no matter how capable, I wouldn’t be buying it. Just saying
I agree. I have been back and forth on 35s vs 33s on a 2D Badlands. My current Rubicon has 33s and the more I look at it I think 33 on 2D Badlands will be my choice....and I can get the MT.IMHO, I think the 35's look perfect on the 4 door but a little large on the 2 door. My Bronco will spend 80% of its time on the interstate. My plan was a 2 door (non squatch) BL but it now prices out higher than the WT. Leaning towards the WT. I dont mind the height of the 35's but may swap out to a thinner tire. Guess I have a couple months to decide...