Seems to me that the mounting point is the threaded bolt hole in the middle of the dash by the "Accessory Ready" script. The device can be mounted there and the ends will rest in the rectangular indents to the left and right.
Sponsored
Gotcha. I've looked into "big rig" and "train" horns but for REAL sounds you need a tank.Not mine. Internet.
Obviously depends on how much junk you want to take with you. IMO, Itās do-able for a trip but definitely on the more compact side. I took my family of 4 to the Outer Banks of North Carolina from Virginia (4 hours) a couple of summers in a row for a week in the 4 door ā15 Wrangler I had a few years back. It was tight and I had to pack far more carefully. Definitely not F-150 space inside.but itās probably nothing even close to say an F150 where you could spread out.
OP do you agree with that on size? Does it seem doable for a long family trip?
The front hip and shoulder room is identical to a ranger. Maybe one dimension was another half inch bigger on the bronco. But yeah, ranger is probably the best readily accessible vehicle to test out the width of the space.I agree with that. If you havenāt sat in one yet, go sit in a wrangler and Ranger. Itās somewhere in between. Definitely more comfortable than wrangler, and more headroom. Itās narrow though, wonāt be a family hauler for us just my toy.
was nice to hear, was worried it might have a meeperthat was the Broncoās horn. The Bronco people saying goodbye.
Na, I donāt care what published specs say, Bronco is a little tighter in the shoulders. The upper portion of the cab flares in more on the Bronco.The front hip and shoulder room is identical to a ranger. Maybe one dimension was another half inch bigger on the bronco. But yeah, ranger is probably the best readily accessible vehicle to test out the width of the space.
Mugs, keychainsLooks like No 2 door for NOVA/MD. boo.
Did they give you points or goodies?
6. As a huge Ford and Bronco enthusiast I really donāt want to be critical of anything, but to put it politely I feel that they chose function over form when it came to the interior. I do understand they designed this to be a serious top down off roader and prioritized the interior to be water resistant for off-roading and because folks will inevitably get caught in a downpour with the top and doors off. I liked the different feel of the āencapsulatedā or rubberized switchgear on the dash and steering wheel and the seats were plenty comfy. Styling or design wise it all visually looks great, but the interior cargo area, dashboard, door panels, and center console were all hard, thin looking plastics. While this is probably the best option for not being damaged by water, to me the materials looked and felt kind of cheap, flimsy or chintzy. I noticed the center console grab handle was really flexy too. It pains me to type that stuff, but it was how I felt during the brief viewing. Iām just sharing my honest first impression. Just my .02
regarding point number 6., are we to assume in case we do get caught in a downpour with the top down, that all the electronics and switches on the dash and center console are waterproofed? or even water resistant?
Not that i would ever try it on purpose but the peace of mind in a situation like that is great.
any opinions?