This is where the weight capacity for a rooftop tent would be lovely!!! ?haha I'm 6'2" so I'll fit diagonally, but with my fiance back there as well may be a little tight. thankfully she's only 5' so we'll give it a shot.
Sponsored
This is where the weight capacity for a rooftop tent would be lovely!!! ?haha I'm 6'2" so I'll fit diagonally, but with my fiance back there as well may be a little tight. thankfully she's only 5' so we'll give it a shot.
Based on the cargo evaluation, it will work on the diagonal. You can probably also fit them with the rear seats up. However, youād be laying the doors on their hinge edge which isnāt ideal for protection. Also youāll be blocking your rear view haha but thereās no point in looking behind you...when all the Jeepās are in the dustLooks like even with the rear seats folded on the 2 door, the doors are a bit long to fit, which we already sort of knew, but this confirms it. Unless they fit sideways in the back I donāt think itāll work.
Thanks!As a math nerd, I decided to calculate the cargo area geometry of a 2021 2-Door Bronco with the rear seats folded down. I then compared that to overall door length and optimal storage orientation. This calculation is based on image reference geometry analyzed in Photoshop and known specs posted on the Ford website.
UPDATE: For a more accurate calculation, I changed the reference dimension from tire diameter to wheel base, per @Fly by Nite recommendation. Thanks!
There's a few things to note:
Let me know your thoughts or if anything should be adjusted!
- In Photoshop, I measured the wheel base in pixels and set that scale to 100.4". The wheel base is the reference dimension for all other measurements.
- The overall length (with tailgate tire) does not match the Ford advertised length of 173.70". In fact, it's off by almost a foot. Perhaps the concept models are smaller than the final vehicle. Or, Photoshop messed something up in it's measurement (highly unlikely). I double checked all my work. I also made sure to account for perspective of the vehicle in the image when measuring the lengths.
- The back plane of the front seats is marked based on other images I've seen of the vehicle. The back seats and center console seem to end about half way through the separation beam between the first and second row.
- The plane of the tailgate is a judgement call. I couldn't find a thickness reference anywhere. I think it's pretty close.
- This model doesn't account for the inability to lay the second-row seats fully flat.
UPDATE: See below for the 4-door reference calculations. It felt wrong leaving the big beauty out of the mix! Feedback appreciated!
Thanks!
Two big things people are trying to hash out-
1. Did you happen to take the dimension of depth of cargo in the 4 door? May take some guessing for the angle of the seat to determine the depth at the load floor.
2. What is the dimension of the rear legroom for 2 and 4 door? Ford I think inaccurately shows at 36.3ā for both. Legroom dimension is tricky. Maybe you could post the dimension from the back of the front seat to the face of the rear seat? It will really be more like a knee room dimension but at least we debunk Fords rear legroom claim by proving they arenāt identical
Actually it may be more accurate to compare the dimension from the top of the steering wheel to face of rear seat for the 2 and 4 door. Given Ford also shows identical front legroom. Thatās a better point of reference given the front seats may be pushed back in the 2 door photo compared to the 4 door photoThanks!
Two big things people are trying to hash out-
1. Did you happen to take the dimension of depth of cargo in the 4 door? May take some guessing for the angle of the seat to determine the depth at the load floor.
2. What is the dimension of the rear legroom for 2 and 4 door? Ford I think inaccurately shows at 36.3ā for both. Legroom dimension is tricky. Maybe you could post the dimension from the back of the front seat to the face of the rear seat? It will really be more like a knee room dimension but at least we debunk Fords rear legroom claim by proving they arenāt identical
The four-door cargo space is 63ā based on my calculation in this thread. Thatās spot on with what youāre claiming. This gives me more confidence in the models.https://www.bronco6g.com/pics-video...inside-accessory-mounts-suspension-sasquatch/
Hereās a bunch of measurements from the test mules I saw. Step in heights are there. Iām guessing the length from back of front seats to swing gate is close to 6ā on the 4-door.
No, based on my measurement, itās over 70ā. 6 ft. Iām guessing you could get another 6ā by scooting the front seat forward.The four-door cargo space is 63ā based on my calculation in this thread. Thatās spot on with what youāre claiming. This gives me more confidence in the models.
I would look for the aerial top down views if you can which will help with the scaling a bit. The perspective view will have a little less error to it.Great point. This would definitely explain some of the discrepancy with overall length of the vehicle. However, since the door storage calculation is all based on reference geometry, I can image this is still accurate for cargo space fit.
<td>Seating capacity</td> | |
<td>4</td> | |
<td>5</td> | |
</tr> | |
<tr> | |
<td>Passenger volume (cu. ft.) Hardtop</td> | |
<td>99</td> | |
<td>103.7</td> | |
</tr> | |
<tr> | |
<td>Passenger volume (cu. ft.) Soft Top</td> | |
<td>N/A</td> | |
<td>108.2</td> | |
</tr> | |
<tr> | |
<td>Behind 1st row (Hardtop) (cu. ft.)</td> | |
<td>52.3</td> | |
<td>77.6</td> | |
</tr> | |
<tr> | |
<td>Behind 2nd row (maximum) (cu. ft.)</td> | |
<td>23.6</td> | |
<td>35.6</td> |
<td><b>Interior Dimensions (projected)</b></td> | |
<td><b>2-Door</b></td> | |
<td><b>4-Door</b></td> | |
</tr> | |
<tr> | |
<td><b>Head room (in.)</b></td> | |
<td></td> | |
<td></td> | |
</tr> | |
<tr> | |
<td>First row (Hard Top)</td> | |
<td>41</td> | |
<td>40.8</td> | |
</tr> | |
<tr> | |
<td>First row (Soft Top)</td> | |
<td>N/A</td> | |
<td>43.3</td> | |
</tr> | |
<tr> | |
<td>Second row (Hard Top)</td> | |
<td>39.8</td> | |
<td>40.1</td> | |
</tr> | |
<tr> | |
<td>Second row (Soft Top)</td> | |
<td>N/A</td> | |
<td>41.1</td> | |
</tr> | |
<tr> | |
<td><b>Leg room (in.)</b></td> | |
<td></td> | |
<td></td> | |
</tr> | |
<tr> | |
<td>First row</td> | |
<td>43.1</td> | |
<td>43.1</td> | |
</tr> | |
<tr> | |
<td>Second row</td> | |
<td>36.3</td> | |
<td>36.3</td> | |
</tr> | |
<tr> | |
<td><b>Hip room (in.)</b></td> | |
<td></td> | |
<td></td> | |
</tr> | |
<tr> | |
<td>First row</td> | |
<td>56.3</td> | |
<td>55.9</td> | |
</tr> | |
<tr> | |
<td>Second row</td> | |
<td>43.3</td> | |
<td>54.8</td> | |
</tr> | |
<tr> | |
<td><b>Shoulder room (in.)</b></td> | |
<td></td> | |
<td></td> | |
</tr> | |
<tr> | |
<td>First row</td> | |
<td>57.1</td> | |
<td>57.1</td> | |
</tr> | |
<tr> | |
<td>Second row</td> | |
<td>51.8</td> | |
<td>56.5</td> |
That'll be snug.I am coming from a 5th Gen 4Runner and I could easily sleep in the back with the seats folded down. I am 5'8.
Does anyone think there is a chance I'd be able to sleep in the back (with the rear gate still closed) of a 2DR Bronco? Based on the measurements by the OP I think not. Remove passenger seat and stuff my head in there?
Depends what kind of sleeper you are! 68ā-tall side sleeper with a slightly tucked knee position might be possible on the 64ā diagonal with only the rear seats folded.I am coming from a 5th Gen 4Runner and I could easily sleep in the back with the seats folded down. I am 5'8.
Does anyone think there is a chance I'd be able to sleep in the back (with the rear gate still closed) of a 2DR Bronco? Based on the measurements by the OP I think not. Remove passenger seat and stuff my head in there?