Not gonna lie. I think it moved! ?
Sponsored
Not gonna lie. I think it moved! ?
"hey Mike, can you confirm when and how 'X' is happening?"Is that a rock star "technical team" they have?
... B&P...
You lose like 40mm of rear travel and 30ish of front I believe with the squatchlands vs badlands.OK... what are the thoughts short of the cool factor.. considering the extra size and weight with the 35's.... I am reserved MT Badlands and still leaning stock 285's just curious what to hard core off roaders think about it with the smaller 2.3L
It's going to be badass!can somebody translate this
If I were getting Badlands I wouldn't bother with Sasquatch. I plan to buy base, though, so Sasquatch on the base gets me everything I would have wanted in Badlands at a much lower cost. No brainer for me.OK... what are the thoughts short of the cool factor.. considering the extra size and weight with the 35's.... I am reserved MT Badlands and still leaning stock 285's just curious what to hard core off roaders think about it with the smaller 2.3L
You mean the smaller one that has more power than my 79 Bronco with a V8 had?OK... what are the thoughts short of the cool factor.. considering the extra size and weight with the 35's.... I am reserved MT Badlands and still leaning stock 285's just curious what to hard core off roaders think about it with the smaller 2.3L