Same combo on Explorer ST, right?10r60 confirmed.
[edit: saw I missed the messages on this. Whoops!]
Sponsored
Same combo on Explorer ST, right?10r60 confirmed.
Increased support & strength in rear end of the frame. Check out a couple of videos that came out the past few days and the diagram shows the added item.Curious why the upgrade to towing capacity. Just the hp increase or wider stance?
How dare you make perfect sense sir.i know its been a minute. But im back!
my BIGGEST point of why i would MUCH rather have the 3.0 vs 5.0 is elevation!
most trails are a mile high plus.
n/a motor will loose 15%+ vs turbo.
also heres my guestination 430/430
The transmission in the Ranger is the 10R80 transmission. The transmission in the Bronco is the 10R60. The one in the Ranger is the heavier duty transmission.What's wrong with the transmission it's been in the ranger for years does it have reliability issues?
The Bronco Raptor also has the Fox Live Valve shocks. It makes sense to me that if the towing capacity in the regular Bronco was limited by the suspension that these Fox shocks could help significantly while towing. The shocks can adjust on the fly to current conditions. So if things start to get wonky with a trailer, the shocks can stiffen the appropriate shocks to help stabilize things. Also, they have a towing mode which I assume also sets the shocks appropriately to add more stability while towing. I see this as a possible reason why the Bronco Raptor has an increased towing capacity.They haven't fully explained why. But evidence suggests it has to do with the suspension and, as @FourHorses said, a beefier hitch receiver setup that allows for more tongue weight.
Definitely not horsepower or torque though. The Ranger has the same 2.3L EcoBoost that's in the Bronco and yet has a tow rating 7500 lbs. Granted, the Bronco is much heavier than the Ranger. But not 4,000 lbs heavier.
Would not at all be surprised if the tow rating change gets ported over to the "normal" Bronco during the mid-generation refresh that is rumored to happen in 2024/2025. Would be a good differentiator between the Bronco and Wrangler.
Some will never be happy unless it comes with a C6 or a toploader.Are Explorer ST's out there blowing transmissions constantly? I don't understand why folks are so bent out of shape about this.
They're not. Tuned Explorers are easily pushing 500+ ft-lb through the stock trans. Some idiot posted some conjecture about what the "60" in 10R60 stands for and people ran with it, totally believing some internet BS and then repeating it without knowing what they're talking about. See below.Are Explorer ST's out there blowing transmissions constantly? I don't understand why folks are so bent out of shape about this.
that's what i was thinking- i already read somewhere that the auto trans for the 2.7 really shouldn't get more than 400 ftlbs of torque going through it.
I've owned a half dozen turbocharged vehicles and have yet to replace a turbocharger in any of them due to failure. This may have been true back in the 60s when you were rolling ciggies into your t-shirt sleeve, but modern turbos usually outlast the vehicle. Stop spreading fake news.2.7l or 3.o liter twin turbo motor has a very limited service life---maybe 80,000 miles before turbos need replacement? A 5.0 liter v8 can be serviced and rebuilt by engine shops all over the US...making a v8 bronco a long-term hold....imo...anything with a turbo will have a short service life....how much is a 2.7L to replace?
What's convenient for their assembly process is why you're only paying $70k hahaForgive me if I don’t care about what’s convenient for your assembly process when I’m shelling out $70-100k for a specialty vehicle.
You don't need a stout transmission if you make the axles the weak pointIs it the same transmission as the standard Bronco? If so I'd be a little concerned....