- Banned
- #91
Wait, so what’s up with the roof?? You have to pay $1,900 for removable windows? Wtf?
Sponsored
I would agree with Sasquatch being too high, but I kind of understand on the 2.7 option. You are getting more cubic inches of engine which takes more material to build. You are getting one more turbo than you had before with the 2.3 which is an extra cost. Plus the 10spd auto with the technology in there is going to cost more to build than the manual. I honestly don't think the Sasquatch should be over $4k on any trim though .I get that but you are also giving them your manual transmission and your 2.3L in exchange. It is way too high in my opinion. That puts a SAS + 2.7L at nearly $10,000. That's too high.
[email protected]-ford.comCan y’all say what email address it comes from? I have thousands of unread in my gmail lol. This will help me search for it haha
It's not set in stone... they're just feeling out opinion.Did you find that out from the survey? Do you know it that is set in stone?
I think they are just looking for estimates on how many people want each option so they can ramp up logistics/manufacturing for those items.Seems very weird they are asking customers what they were willing to buy and at what price.
You have to add in sales tax as well.I'm actually not too upset with this pricing. About $50k for a 4D BD with hard top, 2.7L, and Squatch is about what I was expecting.
Not sure...after I posted I saw the other thread. And the Big Bend it costs 5K for Sasquatch Package.Wait, so what’s up with the roof?? You have to pay $1,900 for removable windows? Wtf?