You lose your man card for the rest of the day for using the word sassy and hardcore in the same sentence instead of Sasquatch. I didn’t make the rules, it’s the order of the universe, can’t bend the rules for you. ?
Sponsored
Sponsored
This 32" vs 35" inch tire discussion reminds of when people try and convince themselves that buying a Honda Rebel/Kawasaki was the better option over getting the Harley Davidson. Because they save money. Lol..
I'll be getting the $5,000 Sasquatch package. Just like I paid $23,000 for the Harley I wanted. No regrets here. My point is trust me you want the Sasquatch and 35"s.
I'll be getting the $5,000 Sasquatch package. Just like I paid $23,000 for the Harley I wanted. No regrets here. My point is trust me you want the Sasquatch and 35"s.
- First Name
- Matt
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2020
- Threads
- 0
- Messages
- 37
- Reaction score
- 74
- Location
- Pittsburgh
- Vehicle(s)
- Jeep LJ
- Your Bronco Model
- Badlands
I think 35s are the minimum for me personally. I’d like to go 37s ideally. Anyone who’s on the fence between 33s and 35s needs to see what they look like actually on a vehicle in person. Go to a Jeep lot and look at the 33s on the rubicon.
- First Name
- Matthew
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2020
- Threads
- 47
- Messages
- 2,720
- Reaction score
- 8,479
- Location
- Northville, MI
- Vehicle(s)
- 2021 Badlands Bronco
- Your Bronco Model
- Badlands
I have read through this post, as I am torn between BD SQ or standard and then upgrade the tires to 33” assuming they will fit. You mention the MT tire. Look through the other threads and watch the videos on the actual tire being offered . It is not a Mud Terrain, it is an All Terrrain. It is also being tested for the “three peak” winter tire designation. It should compare well with the K02s many mention. It’s posted elsewhere, but this is an in depth explanation from Good Year.
The main thing you get with the SQ package that I don’t see mentioned is the HD front axle and locker. This, plus the upgraded tires and depending on the underlying model, the upgraded transfer case make it much more than a lift and Bilstein shocks. I think it would be tough to get a decent lift and 35” tires installed for the same price you get the same in SQ plus all the other upgrades. For me it is a question of will I use the upgraded capabilities. My Jeep LJ with a 2” lift, LS rear end and 32x11.50 BFG M/T was pretty capable and the Bronco should better the Jeep in every way with the BD stock, much less SQ with front and rear lockers, more power and better gearing. I also hate taking the stock tires off and spending $1200 on new tires when the SQ package ends up about $2500 because I already want the upgraded transfer case and aluminum wheels on the BD ? it seems stupid not to go SQ.
- Banned
- #80
Too long to read butLong post, bear with me lol
So I've reserved a 4 door big bend. It comes with P rated 32s. On this two door the size looks 'decent', however I'm curious if they will look small on a 4 door. Either way it desperately needs a more aggressive looking tread imo. (Also not a huge fan of those wheels) So my question is to those that have experience with this, in your opinion would there be any, or much, difference in looks and functionality between 32s and 33s?
Bonus 35s talk: I'm a 2.7/auto guy and I love the way the Sasquatch wheels and tires look, and the stance it gives the Bronco. However I'm not gonna be taking my $43,000(?) daily driver rock crawling. So with that said I don't really need the things that come on that package. Also initial $$$, gas mileage with 35s and 4.7 rear end(even though I'm not an MPG guy at all), don't need MTs and the $$ it will take to replace the 35s when the time comes make me iffy on that package. So what is y'alls opinion on practicality for 35s if you don't need them? And would 32s/33s be able to recreate the same look?
Get the Sasquatch, get the 2.7 you only live once
Sponsored
