- First Name
- Steve
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2021
- Threads
- 4
- Messages
- 573
- Reaction score
- 1,002
- Location
- Saratoga NY
- Vehicle(s)
- '21 Badlands, '01 Z8
- Your Bronco Model
- Badlands
If I had to guess, I would say that Ford has a problem when the basic assembly-line process fails. As soon as a vehicle falls out-f-process due to a quality test failure, mishap, missing part, whatever, it gets sidelined indefinitely because it costs a lot more to pay people to troubleshoot and fix individual issues with individual Broncos than it does to put more Broncos together. That works fine if you're shipping mass-produced vehicles where one is just as marketable as the next, but falls down when each vehicle has a name on it.
I wrote something similar about this on another thread, in regard to the "lost batch" that now seems to be inhabiting Ice Mountain.
https://www.bronco6g.com/forum/threads/tracking-for-remaining-my21-builds.24764/page-35#post-1107083
Ford needs to find a process fix for this. If I had to suggest one, it would be to market sidelined vehicles to dealers in something like an auction; in other words "We don't know when this 4D/BL/2.7/AMB will ship, but when it does we will be willing to invoice it to you at the auction price." If there's plenty of market, dealerships will bid for it. In the meantime, Ford could then arrange a new replacement VIN for the waiting customer order-holder and accelerate that in the line. The customer "wins" because they get their Bronco as quickly as practicable (other things being equal). Ford wins because they (a) have a happier (or at least less unhappy) customer, invoice/sell both Broncos at decent prices, and offer a benefit to their dealerships rather than a liability. And both the order-holding dealership and the bidding dealership win because the one ends up with a happier (or less unhappy) customer, and the other ends up with a Bronco that they believe they can sell at a markup. Who loses in this scenario? Well, if you wanted AMB and your late-2021 Bronco got sidelined, you might miss out on your favorite color. So perhaps an option can be given to the order-holder to hold or swap.
Just spit-balling here. It's clear that there is a flaw in the current build-and-deliver process that is incompatible with custom-order-based production.
I wrote something similar about this on another thread, in regard to the "lost batch" that now seems to be inhabiting Ice Mountain.
https://www.bronco6g.com/forum/threads/tracking-for-remaining-my21-builds.24764/page-35#post-1107083
Ford needs to find a process fix for this. If I had to suggest one, it would be to market sidelined vehicles to dealers in something like an auction; in other words "We don't know when this 4D/BL/2.7/AMB will ship, but when it does we will be willing to invoice it to you at the auction price." If there's plenty of market, dealerships will bid for it. In the meantime, Ford could then arrange a new replacement VIN for the waiting customer order-holder and accelerate that in the line. The customer "wins" because they get their Bronco as quickly as practicable (other things being equal). Ford wins because they (a) have a happier (or at least less unhappy) customer, invoice/sell both Broncos at decent prices, and offer a benefit to their dealerships rather than a liability. And both the order-holding dealership and the bidding dealership win because the one ends up with a happier (or less unhappy) customer, and the other ends up with a Bronco that they believe they can sell at a markup. Who loses in this scenario? Well, if you wanted AMB and your late-2021 Bronco got sidelined, you might miss out on your favorite color. So perhaps an option can be given to the order-holder to hold or swap.
Just spit-balling here. It's clear that there is a flaw in the current build-and-deliver process that is incompatible with custom-order-based production.
Sponsored