2 door, probably Black Diamond. We will still have the Ranger so this is just going to be a fun daily driver for me.Are you getting the 2 or 4 door?
Sponsored
2 door, probably Black Diamond. We will still have the Ranger so this is just going to be a fun daily driver for me.Are you getting the 2 or 4 door?
Honestly, It's been a LONG time since I've owned a AT... I guess I haven't thought about the delays in shifting and not having control over that. Hmmm...something else to consider.We have a 2014 with the same motor. Engine is pretty good, but the transmission stinks imo. It's left us in intersections deciding what gear it should be in before accelerating multiple times and you get either no power or a downshift to a much lower gear than needed when trying to pass on the highway. We will be getting rid of it as a part of the transition to the Bronco. It does have a timing cover leak on the 2.0 at 75k miles that i think shouldn't be happening, but the motor has been good other than that.
Would you stil get the 2.3 if you were getting the 4 door?2 door, probably Black Diamond. We will still have the Ranger so this is just going to be a fun daily driver for me.
I dont have that problem with the 2017 auto transmission. The only thing I really dont like is the DIAL that you use to put in P, D, N, R. It is weird.We have a 2014 with the same motor. Engine is pretty good, but the transmission stinks imo. It's left us in intersections deciding what gear it should be in before accelerating multiple times and you get either no power or a downshift to a much lower gear than needed when trying to pass on the highway. We will be getting rid of it as a part of the transition to the Bronco. It does have a timing cover leak on the 2.0 at 75k miles that i think shouldn't be happening, but the motor has been good other than that.
Probably, the weight difference is minimal. I probably would not go above 33s on the 2.3 though, without at least reading up some more. Four door Ranger handles 32" well but I don't know for sure how it would do with bigger wheels. Ground clearance on the non-squatched Black Diamond is fine for what I need though.Would you stil get the 2.3 if you were getting the 4 door?
x 20psi of boostIt’s an extra .4L of displacement.
My wife's 3.5L ecoboost averages 16 - 17 combined. Mostly around town milesFord Edge Sport 2.7L in the garage, same issue with the tiny fuel tank. I have no idea why Ford loves tiny fuel tanks. MPG ranges from 18 to 29 depending on your driving. ?
So it is safe to say you have to fill up every two or three days . When the gas station has a spot reserved for you, you know your fuel tank is too small.....My wife's 3.5L ecoboost averages 16 - 17 combined. Mostly around town miles
It is a tough comparison to be perfectly symmetrical. Long story short - every piece of metal/plastic/unobtainium that you add to a drivetrain adds weight and friction. The parasitic losses add up with the more stuff that is added. Newer machines have "less" loss than their grandparents due to machining/material/lubrication improvements.As far as "wheel hp" are we considering loss through the T-case? I would imagine it to be minimal but worth consideration. What will be the difference in loss between the two T-cases offered?
100% agree, people have a "want", definitely not a need.nobody needs that kind of power in a vehicle like this (no matter what they tell themselves).
I never saw anything north of 20mpg in my old girl, but I had a lead foot and drove toplessI can confirm. This statement cannot be anymore true.