It's long past time Ford offered a fixed top (or one piece "semi-removable" top) Bronco.
They just need to market it as a Lincoln.
They just need to market it as a Lincoln.
Sponsored
A lot of people with no interest in off-roading bought the Bronco for its coolness factor. The Everett doesn't have that and wouldn't have appealed to that market.If Ford would've brought the Everest to the US, the Bronco would have most likely been a commercial flop. Sure, the off road enthusiasts would still be interested, but I don't see how the Bronco's launch would be successful with a similar model cannibalizing its market.
It's interesting that if Ford had not shit their pants with hard tops, there would be very few threads on the various topics surrounding hard tops.I know that there will be plenty of hate on this post. Let’s get the obvious out of the way…some people love the removable top-but not me.
I would absolutely love to have an option for a solid and fixed roof on this bronco.
I have a 2022 Badlands squatch with hard top and lux package and I love everything about it….except the removable top.
It is literally the only thing about the vehicle that I do not completely adore. The water leaks and noise are ruining an otherwise perfect vehicle for me. It makes me consider switching to anothvehicle, but I waited so long for this vehicle and nothing else really compares.
I’ll keep it and love it, but the solid hard roof would be a game changer for me.
On the current OEM you can remove the split panels over the driver and front passenger without removing the roof rack. But apparently the second panel over the back seat requires rack removal.Are there not roof racks that allow for the removal of panels or is it just the front two that can come off? I am a soft top guy so pretty out of the loop on this one.
I can count on my one hand the amount of times I offroad a year. I can't even begin to count on my hands and feet the amount of times I threw the top back and/or removed the doors and windows.A lot of people with no interest in off-roading bought the Bronco for its coolness factor. The Everett doesn't have that and wouldn't have appealed to that market.
You mean Real Bronco's vs Super Flexes?Frankly this thread is getting about as out of hand as the 2dr vs 4dr threads.
Fair enough, let me rephrase it: The off road enthusiasts and people that think the Bronco is cool would still be interested, but I still don't see how the Bronco's launch would be successful with a similar model cannibalizing its market.A lot of people with no interest in off-roading bought the Bronco for its coolness factor. The Everett doesn't have that and wouldn't have appealed to that market.
If Ford doesn't provide an option then competitors will.Fair enough, let me rephrase it: The off road enthusiasts and people that think the Bronco is cool would still be interested, but I still don't see how the Bronco's launch would be successful with a similar model cannibalizing its market.
There's a significant number of people who bought the Bronco thinking it'd be a cool SUV to bomb around town in, not realizing how "unrefined" it was, and decided to trade it in. If Ford offered another SUV built on the same platform but with more luxury options, I'd have a hard time believing it wouldn't negatively impact Bronco sales.
I am not sure why they didn’t use framed windows. If the doors are on and windows down there isn’t much difference. If the doors are off it doesn’t matter, and the vehicle frame is there at the top anyway. So it wasn’t really about “open air freedom” or such.I live 5 hours away from any serious type of offroading. I live 8 hours away from the nearest mountains to the west and 10 hours away from any mountains to east. The highway noise from my Bronco is fatiguing after 4 hours, and 10 times worse to my wife and daughter who require hearing aids. Because my family would benefit from a quieter vehicle, most members on this board suggest I drive a Bronco Sport instead. EFF that.
I would be all in on a solid top. And throw in frames around the door windows as well. I want a comfortable highway experience and still be able to climb level 7-9 trails in Moab with 37” tires using a mild lift. 4Runners and Explorers don’t have front lockers and can’t fit tires that big without significant and costly modifications. The removable top is not a selling feature I care about. If Ford can build Rangers and Broncos in the same factory floor, they could have a solid top Bronco option in there as well.
They wanted the gimmick of storing all the doors in the back of the Bronco. The frameless windows are one of my biggest complaints. I have to re-index mine all the time. And they rattle when I lower them a couple of inches.I am not sure why they didn’t use framed windows. If the doors are on and windows down there isn’t much difference. If the doors are off it doesn’t matter, and the vehicle frame is there at the top anyway. So it wasn’t really about “open air freedom” or such.
That makes sense, I didn’t even think about the storage point.They wanted the gimmick of storing all the doors in the back of the Bronco. The frameless windows are one of my biggest complaints. I have to re-index mine all the time. And they rattle when I lower them a couple of inches.