AgreedLooks to be the same if you look at the tire in relation to the third brake.
I’m curious how it will work. Honestly a Jeep isn’t too bad to be in the back seat of, vs something like a mustang. It isn’t a luxury vehicle for sure but I had some friends that took a TJ on a 3 hour trip one way just a few months ago. They weren’t comfortable but they survived.Wheelbase looks really short. Was hoping for a useable back seat and cargo. Maybe I’m wrong. I really hope I am.
Well, in my Isuzu, the backseat is surprisingly roomy, and the cargo is also nice. A couple inches more cargo and it would be perfect. That’s my hope for the Bronco. People and cargo in a 2-door.I’m curious how it will work. Honestly a Jeep isn’t too bad to be in the back seat of, vs something like a mustang. It isn’t a luxury vehicle for sure but I had some friends that took a TJ on a 3 hour trip one way just a few months ago. They weren’t comfortable but they survived.
Only in length/wheelbase though. Big difference from being smaller overallAn interesting comment from our friends over at Blue Oval Forums ...
Like we've estimated before, the 2-door Bronco is probably going to be smaller than the baby.
Yeah this looks more like a 2dr wrangler size. You get either useable back seat OR decent cargo space, not both at the same time.Wheelbase looks really short. Was hoping for a useable back seat and cargo. Maybe I’m wrong. I really hope I am.
It would appear a little more internally spacious, at least for the front seat. The Wranglers use some of that wheelbase for the engine compartment and push the front axle forward for better stability. The Bronco appears to use nearly the entire wheelbase for the front row with the windshield and dash farther forward. Some of that could be lost in the positioning of the front seat and the mechanism for access to the presumed rear seat though.Excited and concerned at the same time.
I REALLY want a 2 door, but I was hoping for a few more inches over the Wrangler. 100" seemed like a good number. Can't tell where this sits relative to the JK, so who knows. ...
Third brake light likely telescopes to allow for different tire sizes on the back.Looks to be the same if you look at the tire in relation to the third brake.
Not trying to be negative about the 2dr just sayin it would be nice to have some more room without adding 2 more doors. I had my mind made up on the 2dr since the tarped image was shown. To me a bronco is a 2dr and that is the only way I would buy one as I will Just be using it haul my dogs and gear when I go hunting, fishing or Wheelin through the Backwoods, I hope that's understandable.OK, I am not sure that I understand all of the complaints about the size of the 2Dr. If it is too small, the 4dr is only just over a foot longer. If you want the extra cargo space, having an extra set of door helps to access all the cargo you intend to use.
But, if you want a short wheelbase, i.e. those of us who rock, mud, trail, or drift (our canadian friend here), there is nothing you can do to make it shorter, there is no replacement, no other option.
So if you want more room, you get the 4dr, if you want less room/shorter wheel base, the 2dr.
It will be wider inside than the wrangler, and bythe looks, have more front to back interior space since the hood isn't as long as the wranglers (granted the windshield is tilted further back, so the driver may be in the same spot in both, relatively).
I've been holding off on a 4Runner.I came THIS close to buying a new JL last year, thought I'd wait for the Bronco though. Glad I did, thats my next vehicle right there.