- First Name
- Marcus
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2021
- Threads
- 6
- Messages
- 861
- Reaction score
- 1,201
- Location
- Laguna Woods, Ca
- Vehicle(s)
- Bronco, Triumph Thunderbird Commander 1700
- Your Bronco Model
- Base
The EPA numbers that he was talking about with regard to small trucks is the very reason the Maverick comes as a hybrid, the fuel economy per size of footprint of the truck has to be much higher the smaller they go, hence the hybrid base price model and the more expensive gas option.I don't think it's the conspiracy you make it out to be. Two doors in any form are just not going to sell in near the numbers as a four-door. The Bronco is an outlier and it's still pretty low. The previous-gen Bronco died 26-odd years ago because it was two-door-only. It was replaced by a series of four-door vehicles that effectively replicated the purpose in various sizes (Explorer, Expedition, Excursion). The two-door Explorer was around for a short while, but itself died due to low demand.
In most vehicles offering both two- and four-door models, the footprint between the two is nearly the same. This is especially true for picks where regular cab, SuperCab and SuperCrew sizes generally trade bed for cab. SuperCrew = large cab, small bed. SuperCab = smaller cab, larger bed. Regular cab = long bed. There are some variations in footprint, but the point is people can buy a two-door F-150 but they rarely do. In fact, the only way to get a small F-150 is in the two-door, yet it still is vastly outsold by the SuperCab which is outsold by the SuperCrew. It's not about not being able to get a small truck, it's that most buyers can't afford to have one vehicle perform exclusive duties. Factor in the MSRP of vehicles today and it's even more relevant.
The reason why you can't get a mini pickup like you could in the '80s is the same reason why a Honda Civic today is two sizes smaller than an Accord was back when the last Bronco was around: vehicles have gotten larger. And larger. And larger. Three class sizes in three generations.
Good news: if you really want a smaller pickup, there's a Maverick (and likely other competitors) coming soon to a showroom near you. It will be based off the Bronco Sport platform, so it won't be any larger than the previous-gen Ranger. Alas, it won't come in a two-door option because there's no demand for it.
Other notes on other posts:
After having a 2dr 4wd p/u with a 6 foot bed and a stick, I'd go for that in a heart beat. That's the only reason I ordered the Bronco, for a base 4wd stick.
Agree with the "switching away" from cars to CUVs, SUVs and trucks as a reason for Ford to build different variants of trucks and the like; take all the sales from your competitors that they can and a few extra choice will make more happy buyers, not just the few that switch from Ranger to a Bronco truck.
The stick and the removable top & doors make it a different, truck, and for some a better choice, while a business owner may want a hard top Ranger. Just saying choices. How much would it cost to build with all the platform sharing already going on? Yet a base 4wd 2dr with manual trans and removable hard top could go for a $1500 premium over the base 2dr Bronco.
Agree that the Bronco Truck would be an addition to and confirm the reports of a plan that make the Bronco it's own line up. I think they kinda are trying to use the Mach e to do the same for continuing the Mustang lineup into the electrified future.
If they phase their way into that we could see a hybrid Mustage and then a bad ass Mach e mustang, but due to the electric motors being smaller than a V8, a 2dr coupe that's smaller than today's GT.
Sponsored