But....if they come up with a factory tune for 2.3 manual like the ranger 2.3 auto, that would be 320hp / 355 lb torque. They really should tweak the engine before the fall with this spec and charge a little more. I would get this.
Looks like a Job for Captain Obvious
Tires and wheels is easy. Getting front and rear lockers oem is the key. Which made Sasquatch so good!
The Jeep moves out with there 2.0. Even with 35/37 Jeep people love it! It has similar specs to the 2.3.
Don’t want the 3.0/3.5. Want the v8! 5.0 or 7.3.
LOL but please no cheby engine in a ford, no way never, it's a crimeDon’t want the 3.0/3.5. Want the v8! 5.0 or 7.3.
it is confirmed, in the color sheet!
Maybe it's a late availability paint color since it's not on the website.
I also hate when manufacturers only offer imaginary engines
no mt with the squatch
this would be sacrilegeDon’t want the 3.0/3.5. Want the v8! 5.0 or 7.3.
I was asking the question to prove this needs to change!no mt with the squatch
this would be sacrilege
Not sure about that. At this point, we have no idea what the curb weight will be. True, big tires add a lot of unsprung weight, but they can just offer it in the 2 door, which shouldn't be much more than 4000lbs. 310 lb ft of torque and revised gearing should get those big boys around. Many guys run a Wrangler manual with an engine with less HP and torque.
True I could possibly see the 2.3 working adequately in the 2 doorNot sure about that. At this point, we have no idea what the curb weight will be. True, big tires add a lot of unsprung weight, but they can just offer it in the 2 door, which shouldn't be much more than 4000lbs. 310 lb ft of torque and revised gearing should get those big boys around. Many guys run a Wrangler manual with an engine with less HP and torque.
If you're off-roader was meant to go fast, wouldn't be shaped like a damn brick. old, but true statement.
Although I'm opting for the 2.7 on the 2 door, I won't be flying through any trails, just creeping along. Makes the experience linger longer.
