- First Name
- Dick
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2021
- Threads
- 88
- Messages
- 7,503
- Reaction score
- 25,546
- Location
- PNW
- Website
- www.TD-Distributing.com
- Vehicle(s)
- 21 Bronco, 88 Bronco II, 03 Ford F250
- Your Bronco Model
- Badlands
- Thread starter
- #211
Looks like an accurate summary. Based on what we've learned here I feel the Ford brackets are the best insurance if you can get them, and LOD is a decent consolation prize. At least the crumple zone is designed for lateral crumpling.I'll admit I overreacted and immediately pulled my apex winch and RC mount a couple nights ago. All the posts about leverage made me uncomfortable using it without reinforcements, and I've been itching to figure out how much of my rake was caused by the winch anyways (front fender flare is only a half inch higher after removing winch and mount if anyone cares). Now I'm struggling with where to go from here.
facts:
- frame horns can bend under extreme loads (like being towed off road with nose in the air with a lot of abrupt jolts)
- frame horns did not bend using the RC mount to get out of the snow
- ford's mount reinforces the frame (along with a couple other bumpers)
- the recovery points are bolted to the frame horns in the same way without reinforcement
assumptions:
- the angle of the RC mount may put too much twist on the frame and bend it, but we haven't seen that yet
- choosing a mount that puts the winch in line with the frame may mitigate the risk of frame damage, at the cost of approach angle
- adding reinforcements may affect crumple zone, but may mitigate risk of RC high mount twisting the frame
Am I missing anything?
I didn't measure but my front is probably riding an inch or more higher without the winch and bumper on right now.
Sponsored