The additional power is almost exclusively a result of additional timing, provided by look-up tables, that can be ADDED to the final timing advance if the OAR sees no instances of detonation. The tables don’t really provide additional boost (more airflow) due to higher octane. I could throw some ECU tables uphelp illustrate it, but it’s way more involved than “hey, no detonation, let’s add timing”.You can run a leaner mixture with higher octane and achieve a better mpg. If Ford's tuning table can handle 87-93 octane spread, it's possible it can run a leaner part throttle map for better efficiency at 93 than 87.
It's been a long time since I've been near tuning tables (GM L98); I'm sure there's been a lot of advances since then.
It seems to me the eco boost motors are really 'premium only' engines that support low octane fuel via comparably expanded tuning tables. Therefore highest power and efficiency is available with 93 octane, running less octane decreases power and efficiency, but will not damage the engine.
Generating 300hp will require the same amount of fuel no matter the octane rating. The additional hp from higher octane is achieved by burning more fuel by stuffing more air, increasing the effective compression ratio, for which higher octane is needed.
Sponsored