This could be a Bronco test Mule

JimmyDean

Badlands
Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2019
Messages
1,574
Reaction score
3,476
Location
Louisiana
Vehicle(s)
82 Bronco, 513 ci; 71 mach 1, 351C; 06 F-250, 6.0; 56 800, 172c.i. gas
If it was the Courier there wouldn't seem to be much of a size difference from the Ranger.
could be possible, would explain the 5-lug. But being a unibody wouldn't that be nigh impossible to do a hack job body for a mule like this?

I don't understand where the reasoning that this isn't some Chevrolet test mule is coming from though. Is Chevy not allowed to use watts linkages? The plate is a Michigan plate, which is seen on some Chevy mules, along with New York plates on some, not just Fords.

(And what's up with those uprights?)

on edit, after looking around, I see where it was spotted with an Everest and license plate numbers on the two being extremely close. the uprights for rollover testing, some more photos showed the holes that would be used to mount them horizontal. So, yeah, some type of Ford hackjob test mule for something. I'm thinking the baby bronco possibly however considering the insanely low ground clearance for an offroad truck on those a-arms. Even basic rollover testing would need to be done on an accurate ride-height vehicle with complete and correct running gear.



Advertisement


 
Last edited:

BroncoMike

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2019
Messages
638
Reaction score
993
Location
Upper Norwegia
Vehicle(s)
'71 Bronco, '02 Excursion
Even basic rollover testing would need to be done on an accurate ride-height vehicle with complete and correct running gear.
And for it to be of any value, complete and correct body and interior.

All the more reason to carefully ponder the real purpose behind this exercise.
 

JimmyDean

Badlands
Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2019
Messages
1,574
Reaction score
3,476
Location
Louisiana
Vehicle(s)
82 Bronco, 513 ci; 71 mach 1, 351C; 06 F-250, 6.0; 56 800, 172c.i. gas
And for it to be of any value, complete and correct body and interior.

All the more reason to carefully ponder the real purpose behind this exercise.
For legal ratings and stuff yes. But for engineering, not so much. You could apply ballast to change the suspended CoGs and weight distribution with a fabbed body, but the unsuspended and rotating portions needs to be fairly accurate.
 

Nickp

Black Diamond
Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
First Name
Nick
Joined
Jan 13, 2019
Messages
2,167
Reaction score
7,093
Location
Phoenix
Vehicle(s)
WRANGLER PROBABLY TOTALED SEARCHING FOR SHITBOX
Got a response from my source at Ford. It’s a courier mule not a bronco mule.
 

JimmyDean

Badlands
Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2019
Messages
1,574
Reaction score
3,476
Location
Louisiana
Vehicle(s)
82 Bronco, 513 ci; 71 mach 1, 351C; 06 F-250, 6.0; 56 800, 172c.i. gas

Stampede.Offroad

Badlands
Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2018
Messages
1,748
Reaction score
2,734
Location
SD
Vehicle(s)
junk
Got a response from my source at Ford. It’s a courier mule not a bronco mule.
I guess I wasn't looking at Escape or other small car platform parts when I was trying to figure out where those arms and axles came from. It would make more sense for the 5-lugs. The length would seem about right for a small ute or service trucklet, but I was expecting the Courier to be narrower too.
 

Nickp

Black Diamond
Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
First Name
Nick
Joined
Jan 13, 2019
Messages
2,167
Reaction score
7,093
Location
Phoenix
Vehicle(s)
WRANGLER PROBABLY TOTALED SEARCHING FOR SHITBOX
Keep in mind the escape and ranger are basically the same width. I have a 2017 Escape and it’s basically the perfect width IMO.
 

Toyhoarder

Badlands
Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2018
Messages
344
Reaction score
533
Location
The west
Vehicle(s)
Early Bronco, F-150, F-450
Pretty sure that’s a body on frame vehicle not unibody.

That would rule out the baby bronco and courier wouldn’t it?
 

Nickp

Black Diamond
Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
First Name
Nick
Joined
Jan 13, 2019
Messages
2,167
Reaction score
7,093
Location
Phoenix
Vehicle(s)
WRANGLER PROBABLY TOTALED SEARCHING FOR SHITBOX
Pretty sure that’s a body on frame vehicle not unibody.

That would rule out the baby bronco and courier wouldn’t it?
They can easily have fake frame rails etc. I trust my source but literally all he said is “it’s a courier mule.” I trust him 100% for clearing things up but he won’t go into detail.
 

Toyhoarder

Badlands
Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2018
Messages
344
Reaction score
533
Location
The west
Vehicle(s)
Early Bronco, F-150, F-450
Fake frame rails? Hahaha. You can see daylight between the frame and bed.

Isn’t the courier supposed to be based on the focus platform? If so, I guarantee it has IRS, not a solid rear axle.
 

78CreamBrownie

Badlands
Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2018
Messages
120
Reaction score
173
Location
Louisiana
Vehicle(s)
2018 Sting Grey Jeep JL
I think Ford is having fun with the media and all the hype that any testing vehicle brings. This thing, plus the Frankenmule and the 2 Door Raptor thing is just bringing more and more hype to Ford's future lineup and it is keeping them in the spotlight. Sure they could test it with normal looking Tophats, but why not make some odd and be sure it gets attention.

Seriously why in the world would Ford use a Chevy Tophat other than press coverage. They know people are going to figure it out and write about it.

Bravo Ford,Bravo.
 



 








Top