SeenPaging @mpeugeot
Sponsored
SeenPaging @mpeugeot
Extremely unlikely.There is a distinct possibility that we are reaching an erroneous conclusion regarding the valves being defective given the range of failed motor dates. I want to see spark plugs, because I am suspecting that these failures are occurring typically in cruise or light loading situations where the engine is under boost, where detonation could easily destroy a rod bearing and result in piston to valve contact. If the OP has his Fordpass app he might be able to see some of the error messages from the engine.
Exactly. There have been a handful of 2.7 issues, but folks are acting like it's every third one. We are probably nowhere near recall or even TSB territory, yet.you make it sound like about ever 2.7 getting blown ,they all can't be winners .
Or perhaps Ford sent a few bombs out into the fleet to scare new customers into buying the extended warrantee. Now that would be shocking.The blown engine builds range from June to September so far so it might be completely random.
What's bullshit? That I have seen it. I would maintain a list if anyone gave a shit about the thread, but no one seems interested in the thread, so why put forth effort when b6g doesn't seem to be interested in it.
BULLSHIT -
that's a DEAD END - that thread is not maintained - the OP needs to list known failures, w new cases added -
- never been updated - not even once -
@Lance103222 pls use this post to determine your engine build-date. B6g can then add to the range of known build-date failures -
What makes you say that? All you would need is to be under boost, part throttle, and have a failure of one of the two injector sets while both were supposed to be fired (whether a calibration or a fuel system failure) and the resulting lean condition would destroy something in short order.Extremely unlikely.
So, this is probably an over reaction. From what I've read about the recent 2.7 failures is it is tied to a defective supplier valvetrain part (the valve keepers IIRC). As with any mass-produced product, if it is assembled wrong or has a defective manufactured part, it will fail early, which seems to be the case with the 2.7 in the Bronco. It looks like they mostly fail sub 4,000 miles. Thinking that this same valvetrain failure is going to occur 20,000 or 50,000 miles out is unwarranted. It is a manufacturing defect that shows early in use, not later.Well then, I guess that settles that!
Too many just to be happenstance failures.
I'm going for the long haul so let's just cover all the bases.
Well step right up and do it. You will be loved by all of the B6G forum members that care. Compare my railcar thread with the 2.7 tracking thread... People cared where their Bronco was and other community members jumped in to help. I didn't see that reaction on the 2.7 engine tracking thread.
' no one seems interested ' ?? . . . is that a joke ??
in the immortal words of John McEnroe :
'You Can NOT be SERIOUS' !!!
Supposebly a bad batch of valves from an outside vendor but ford is being a bunch of dick bags and not saying anythingI thought ford built this 2.7 for durability and intensive testing was done . Wtf is going with ford ? Probably a bad batch of parts hopefully