The Chrysler Pacifica is not a body on frame vehicle that's why its floor panels are much deeper.Right there with the new Landcruiser, I keep waiting to see what the interior space will be. No one does a fold flat setup anymore. If a Chrysler Pacifica can have fold flat seating why can't a premium vehicle.
I understand, but the complete failure to get a flat floor just kills the utility part of SUV. When you go to the next price bracket I feel the engineering should be a higher level.The Chrysler Pacifica is not a body on frame vehicle that's why its floor panels are much deeper.
Me too, and more competition the better.I'm a fan of non-cookie cutter vehicles, and hope this thing is a success.
I understand . . .
Before you badmouth the BMW powerplant how many miles have you driven one? We racked up 150,000 on our 2008 5 series. Only true engine issue was flywheel position sensor.I've thought about looking, but that was when I saw/thought that it started at $58k, $70k+ seems a bit much, but maybe I'm still pretending prices are from 2017. I really like the wagon, but the build I'd want would probably cost $30K more than what my Bronco is.
I also have a really hard time trusting the BMW turbo-6 they chose, that seems like the complete opposite of what you'd want in a vehicle overbuilt with an assumed lifetime of hundreds of thousands of miles. Obviously we don't get the diesel so they needed something, but a BMW engine? I didn't even mention the trans or ridiculous shifter