They won't. The problem is there are too many consumers who reward this type of behavior.I was thinking that too.. maybe they will reconsider their current business practice with the realization? Wishful thinking?
Sponsored
They won't. The problem is there are too many consumers who reward this type of behavior.I was thinking that too.. maybe they will reconsider their current business practice with the realization? Wishful thinking?
Was it the dealer who put the miles on it, or did it arrive with those miles? Could be a dirt mountain Bronco or one selected for testing etc.Wow, 300+ miles on a customer ordered vehicle? Dealerships like this give a bad reputation to all of the other decent ones. I wonder if they turned this into a demo vehicle out of spite.
doubtful!I was thinking that too.. maybe they will reconsider their current business practice with the realization? Wishful thinking?
I'm all for giving them what they deserve, but leaving negative feedback posted may not get op his Bronco. Sounded like he needed to agree to remove it before a deal is struck.I was thinking that too.. maybe they will reconsider their current business practice with the realization? Wishful thinking?
LOL Lindsay Ford is trying to flood themselves with fake 5 Star reviews to hide all the 1 Star reviews the shister management continues.
let’s hope you suddenly delete this thread and post a completely random picture of a 2D bronco with keys in hand!Update: dealership texted me that upper management is looking into my situation and in the event this does work out in my favor, they are looking for a mutual understanding and agreement to remove any direct and indirect negative online feedback regarding this matter.
Let's see where this goes.
We sell both new Ford vehicles and used (all manufacturers). For as long as I've been at this dealership, it's been standard practice to always make the customers sign a deal disclosure if they're leaving a deposit on a vehicle. It will have an agreement on the numbers, finance terms, etc, as a method of protecting both us and the customers. Both parties understand what's being agreed upon, and it protects us down the road if the customer, for example, declines additional warranty, has a problem with their 9 year old used vehicle with high mileage 6 months after purchase and then demands that we fix everything for free. But it also protects the customer when it comes to ordered units in that we're acknowledging that we're locking them in to a preferred interest rate, (for example) or a certain discount (remember those?), or whatever else we've agreed upon that neither parties will remember 6 months down the road when the vehicle arrives.I hate regulations, but sounds like there needs to be a standardized purchase form like a Loan Estimate that is used when getting a mortgage. Every single bank has to use the same form and once it is disclosed, it can only changed under certain circumstances and must be redisclosed. You can't just add fees/costs without very specific reasons.
Essentially, if you order a vehicle through a dealer, they should be legally required to provide a standardized form that locks in the MSRP/price and makes them disclose any additional fees they will be charging. If it isn't on that form at the time the vehicle is ordered, then they shouldn't be able to charge it.
Gonna have to be a whole bunch of Bronco6g members removing their reviews. Doh!Update: dealership texted me that upper management is looking into my situation and in the event this does work out in my favor, they are looking for a mutual understanding and agreement to remove any direct and indirect negative online feedback regarding this matter.
Let's see where this goes.
My reply in general about the Statute of Frauds was written before this was posted so I am not responding to this specifically about Maryland Courts, just to clarify.Are Verbal Contracts and Agreements Binding in Maryland?
In Maryland, verbal agreements, also called oral agreements or oral contracts, may be legally binding, provided they meet certain criteria.
Maryland courts also want to make sure that the terms of the verbal agreement were sufficiently clear to inform both parties as to their obligations. Maryland law requires that an oral contract be “sufficiently clear and definite in order that the courts … may be able to know the purpose and intention of the parties.”
Thank you for your information here which I do not believe any of us can reasonably interpret as specific legal advice given to any of us individually.My reply in general about the Statute of Frauds was written before this was posted so I am not responding to this specifically about Maryland Courts, just to clarify.