Not all of us will.And we will be geared significantly lower. Something that seems to be forgotten alot.
4.27 is very low. 4.10 used to pretty rare on the street. That was with 3 and 4-speed auto's. manuals will have crawl and auto's have 10 speeds.Not all of us will.
Base is 3.73 with the auto, same as the Ranger and some F-150s.4.27 is very low. 4.10 used to pretty rare on the street. That was with 3 and 4-speed auto's. manuals will have crawl and auto's have 10 speeds.
It is not irresponsible. If you have something to provide I am open to listen to you as you are a mechanic. You are saying there are no issues with the 2.3? Head gaskets, blocks, injection? Please convince me to stay with the 2.3. I noticed that "mechanics" love them or hate them.
Most people; including myself prefer an inline 4. Take a look at the Toyota 22r with 135hp with 35's and gearing can climb walls with 300K on the odometer. I am concerned on longevity and reliability.
I didn't realize there was a 3.73 offering. Still not going to affect reliability. Broken 2.3's are from early teething problems in 2015 and abused motors in later Mustangs. I think there is just a culture of V8 purists that cant stand for 4 cyl being an option trying to tarnish it.Base is 3.73 with the auto, same as the Ranger and some F-150s.
I've never needed or wanted removable top and doors. I probably won't even use that feature on the Bronco. But everyone has different needs and wants. To each their own, and such.
Also, in before someone says "Everything is removable if you have the right tools" and posts a pic of a reciprocating saw...
Tire size will reduce the ratio as well the F-150 with 3.73 runs a 31.5" tire not a 33" or 35"4.27 is very low. 4.10 used to pretty rare on the street. That was with 3 and 4-speed auto's. manuals will have crawl and auto's have 10 speeds.
Yeah, I didn't realize 3.73 was an option. It would be fine for a 30-32 inch tire, but if going 35" later, they should just consider Squatch. You get the bigger/cast front diff too.Tire size will reduce the ratio as well the F-150 with 3.73 runs a 31.5" tire not a 33" or 35"
It is not that I have seen, just using the F-150 example that @Haystack had used to get tires size and ratios in the same context..Yeah, I didn't realize 3.73 was an option. It would be fine for a 30-32 inch tire, but if going 35" later, they should just consider Squatch. You get the bigger/cast front diff too.
Yeah, I didn't realize 3.73 was an option. It would be fine for a 30-32 inch tire, but if going 35" later, they should just consider Squatch. You get the bigger/cast front diff too.
It is not that I have seen, just using the F-150 example that @Haystack had used to get tires size and ratios in the same context..
The one with the most horsepowers. Because reasons.