dang. 2.3 or 2.7? Are you running a tune or is that factory?For those that say you don'tneed a catch can. Check this . This is after 9,800 miles. That is not inside my intake and all the better.
Sponsored
dang. 2.3 or 2.7? Are you running a tune or is that factory?For those that say you don'tneed a catch can. Check this . This is after 9,800 miles. That is not inside my intake and all the better.
Factory, no tune.dang. 2.3 or 2.7? Are you running a tune or is that factory?
dang. 2.3 or 2.7? Are you running a tune or is that factory?
@SevenT .... Which Engine? 2.3L or 2.7L?????Factory, no tune.
This tiny amount of oil over that many miles is NOTHING when you consider that all of it that gets hot or carbonized (near hot engine parts) will be ”washed away” by your port injectors. Therefore your intake and valves will be just as clean with or without your can...IF you had ONLY direct injection, then this would actually be a benefit.For those that say you don'tneed a catch can. Check this . This is after 9,800 miles. That is not inside my intake and all the better.
Sorry, 2.7L. Did not read correctly. Engine is original signature.@SevenT .... Which Engine? 2.3L or 2.7L?????
Agree to a point in that the 2.7 dual port (unlike the 2.3 direct injection) will inject gas ahead of the intake valve, which will help battle the carbon build up on the back of the valve caused by the crank case gases coming back through the PCV system and into the intake, but the catch can will still "catch" the oil vapors suspended in the air being pushed back through the intake, which in turn will allow for a cleaner combustion and lower emissions.From all I've heard, these new 2.7 gen 2 Nano's are dual port injected. They have no need for a catch can set up.
It works! I guess I just didn't wait long enough to check it. I have 2800 miles on it now and it now has a small pool of oil at the bottom. Strange thing is I expected it to be dirty oil but it is very clean. So, I guess it is working as intended?
I would also prefer it not mixing with fuel in the cylinder since I pay for 93 octane and getting a tune.For those that say you don'tneed a catch can. Check this . This is after 9,800 miles. That is not inside my intake and all the better.
Interesting.... I agree stock 2.7 shouldn't need it but there should be more than a film. I'm leaning towards the breather being an open system.Alright guys so I installed a UPR catch can and oil breather cap on my 2.7 bronco day 1 with 40 miles. I have 1,600 miles on it so far with some hard use, first oil change performed at 1,000. At no point has the catch can picked up anything. There is a slight oil film inside but nothing more. Catch can is definitely installed correctly. Anyone else have this "issue" or know what could be the cause? The only thing I could think of is the breather cap is allowing the crankcase to breath so well that the catch can doest have enough oil to pick up. There is often oil coated around the cap. Any help is appreciated.
Do you happen to be saling these through your business?I just checked our UPR catch can on our 2.7L First Edition after about 9k miles. It's definitely doing it's job.
Indeed we do. Here’s a link to the UPR catch cans we offer. If you have any other questions or need help placing an order feel free to give us a shout.Do you happen to be saling these through your business?