Even those numbers might be telling.I don't have access to that type of info. The parts system shows how many are in a depot, in transit to the depot, at a packager, how many are currently backordered and demand forecast.
Sponsored
Even those numbers might be telling.I don't have access to that type of info. The parts system shows how many are in a depot, in transit to the depot, at a packager, how many are currently backordered and demand forecast.
You'll find out that's not true when Ford botches the lightning launch worse than this.It's all a conspiracy to make us embrace electric gokarts as our future instead of real vehicles that burn dinosaurs.
Pump the brakes before you start crowing about the 2.3.And people gave me crap for being so adamantly in favor of the 2.3L
Well obviously, I was wrong... To add insult to injury, my 2.7 has refused to die in over 5k miles.Should’ve seen the crap from half the forum when @mpeugeot started original thread to collect data. Where’d they go??
So clearly you didn't try the 7MT thenAbsolutely hated the 2.3 in the Bronco. Never tested it in the Ranger but I almost canceled my order after an extended 24 hr. test drive in the 2.3 BD my dealer. It felt, drove and sounded like a rental Nissan sentra or something. The 2.7 is amazing if it doesn't blow up!
Did anyone notice the most important parts of the above post?I got nothing. I can say the parts system is showing the below as of 1/17/22....
Pending engineering change
3 expected to arrive at packager
5 pieces in transit for distribution
8 pieces to be shipped from packager
FCSD is working on part availability
Glad you stated when, not if.You'll find out that's not true when Ford botches the lightning launch worse than this.
Wow...are there people that actually wanted a 2.3L? I thought they were just choosing those so they could get a Bronco sooner.And people gave me crap for being so adamantly in favor of the 2.3L
I've got two different 2.3L specs in my garage and they're both fantastic. One of them even makes over 400hp and 400lb/ft. Forget getting my Bronco sooner, the 7MT was the only option for me.Wow...are there people that actually wanted a 2.3L? I thought they were just choosing those so they could get a Bronco sooner.
I'm 21162. So, I have a tiny little clear gap down there from about 160-165....at least so far.Much thx . . Man, this is cutting into the 'Clear Gap'
EDIT:
- engine build-date June 28 . . & Bronco build-date Aug 09 - thx, got it
- in opening post, the table and histogram are updated
- the 'clear gap' (i.e. 'in the clear' range) now only 27-days, 21180 thru 21206
- now 17 data-points (engine build-dates)
From the thread on reddit:Man, looks new
- any details ?
Ah, I remember the days of driving around manual 4 bangers, primarily out of necessity. Seems like I've run across a few 2.7's making 500+ on the intertubesI've got two different 2.3L specs in my garage and they're both fantastic. One of them even makes over 400hp and 400lb/ft. Forget getting my Bronco sooner, the 7MT was the only option for me.
What rpm are you at to get those 400hp ?I've got two different 2.3L specs in my garage and they're both fantastic. One of them even makes over 400hp and 400lb/ft. Forget getting my Bronco sooner, the 7MT was the only option for me.