- First Name
- Kyle
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2020
- Threads
- 12
- Messages
- 1,662
- Reaction score
- 4,787
- Location
- Independence, MO
- Vehicle(s)
- 2D JL Rubicon
- Your Bronco Model
- Badlands
Or, there are. The actual torque at the tire in the lowest gear (crawler for manual 2.3L and first for the auto 2.7L) as multiplied through the entire drivetrain is almost identical. That could imply that there were ratings they were being mindful of in designing the systems. Going to the manual behind the additional torque of the V6 may push something else (transfer case, differential, CV joints, etc.) beyond the limits they are comfortable with. That's not to mention that the particular configuration of the transmission they chose for the 2.3L is right at the very limit of the torque the V6 can produce. So, no. It may have far more variables than simply machining up a new bellhousing. At the very least, they'd have to upgrade the transmission. But it very well could be a cascading effect of finding the next weakest link. That's why it will take some time and money, if it ever happens at all. Ford has to stick a warranty on these things and make a profit. If a significant change to any system creates a chain of other potential issues it may not be worth the investment, especially for a configuration that will have an abysmal take rate. A small group of enthusiasts clamoring for it does not equate to its potential to sell to the general public.Citing "technical reasons" implies there's a problem to be solved or a mechanical limitation to be overcome. The trans can handle the torque, they just need to cast a different bellhousing. This isn't a multi-year process to design out a brand new drivetrain and overcome a whole bunch of limitations of existing hardware.
Sponsored
Last edited: