Not impossible when the 150 “hybrid” boasts a 700 mi range which is great until you read 30 gallon tank smh lolZero percent chance it's going to have that range. It would either require something obscene like a 40 gallon tank or 50 MPG.
They probably just put a ridiculous number so no one would think whatever number was shown was representative of max range.Not impossible when the 150 “hybrid” boasts a 700 mi range which is great until you read 30 gallon tank smh lol
I mean 1050 is impossible but I wouldn’t put it past them to put some huge tank to create misleading fuel economy numbers
How about a 33gal tank while getting 32MPGZero percent chance it's going to have that range. It would either require something obscene like a 40 gallon tank or 50 MPG.
I struggle to get 20mpg in my Ranger... Even with a manual and driving like Morgan Freeman I doubt I would get anything better than 24 with the Bronco. I'm hoping I'll find out soon though!How about a 33gal tank while getting 32MPG
My Wrangler with 33 inch tires gets about 12 miles to gallon. I'm sure Bronco will be better than that, but I don't expect great fuel economy from the Broncos.How about a 33gal tank while getting 32MPG
Exactly this. If anyone is purchasing this vehicle with the expectations of great fuel economy, I think they may be disappointed. Good? Maybe. But you may want to cancel the squatch package and the 500 pounds of accessories. I’m looking for smiles per gallon and if I go out in the wilderness I’ll be sure to have a gas container stowed on the roof/bumper etc.My Wrangler with 33 inch tires gets about 12 miles to gallon. I'm sure Bronco will be better than that, but I don't expect great fuel economy from the Broncos.