This.Also pretty sure the question is going to bring in users that are already looking at manuals, so then it’s basically would a manual buyer get a manual on a larger engine, which most will say yes.
That said, part of your argument that certain trim levels of sports cars have higher take rates for manual transmissions only supports the idea that Ford should really only offer manuals on the trims that they think people would actually buy them. I'm old enough to remember that the reason why people bought manuals was because they were cheaper and returned better gas mileage. (And, to a lesser extent, that autos robbed some power.) As those factors disappeared, so did the manual.
If I'm getting a sports car, I'm much more interested in a manual than if I'm getting an SUV or sedan or other people-mover. Perhaps I'm not enough of an off-road enthusiast that the idea of three-pedaling (with two feet) in Moab doesn't excite me. But I fully support if someone else wants to.
As far as the 2.7 manual goes, I don't think Ford expected there would be much interest in the manual at all, let alone with the 2.7, so probably initially chose the 2.3 only to keep things simpler. I don't know what it takes for them to make that happen (I thought I read somewhere else here that the 2.7 would require a different housing to mate to the manual, which could make that a longer process), but I'm sure if the bean counters figure they can sell more units than the extra cost requires, they'll do it.
Sponsored