Mine came off about 20K miles ago and I haven’t missed it.Same.
You get out to air down your tires anyway, what’s another 90 seconds unbolting your own swaybar ?
Sponsored
Mine came off about 20K miles ago and I haven’t missed it.Same.
You get out to air down your tires anyway, what’s another 90 seconds unbolting your own swaybar ?
find a better dealer, we used to be that "i am sorry you have a cold air filter, your powertrain warranty is void" but things changed thankfully and it depends on the dealership, noone is saying that if your modifications made your stock vehicle implode it should be covered but just because you modified it doesnt mean it is void. did you lift it or do something that a reasonable person would associate this with the sway bar not working?I know, but what am i supposed to do, sue them ? dealership or ford ?
True, if and only if these stressors caused a mechanical failure, but let's say that a sensor failed in the unit or some other electrical malfunction? That certainly isn't the fault of suspension geometry or non-OEM parts installed on the vehicle. That's like trying to blame non-oem sparkplugs for a failure of the infotainment display.Okay. Pretend I’m Ford’s lawyer. Here’s my argument.
The anti sway bar disconnect will add an extra few inches of wheel articulation when disconnected. It was engineered to release and connect on level surfaces under the exact stresses and geometries afforded by the factory suspension. The user intentionally changed those stressors and geometry when they lifted the vehicle. They used non-OES/OEM parts that are not specifically approved by Ford to work with the Sta-bar system.
How can you argue against that?
There are manual sway bar disconnects made for this exact reason.
Sensors generally operate by heat, position, air flow, oxygen or radio signal. If one changes the position of the sensor, why should it be expected to work? Sensors are not some universally adaptable device. They’re precision units that require careful positioning and calibration.True, if and only if these stressors caused a mechanical failure, but let's say that a sensor failed in the unit or some other electrical malfunction? That certainly isn't the fault of suspension geometry or non-OEM parts installed on the vehicle. That's like trying to blame non-oem sparkplugs for a failure of the infotainment display.
Some cheaply made sparkplugs can generate RF that can cause electrical interference. I'd go with another argumentblame non-oem sparkplugs for a failure of the infotainment display.
And I think another thing that many people don't realize is that the intention of Magnuson Moss wasn't to allow people to throw a 12" lift and 50s on their SUV and then force the manufacturer to scientifically prove the lift and tires caused their transfer case to explode. The intention of MM was to prevent manufacturers from requiring OEM parts for maintenance because then they would have a monopoly on things like oil filters, brake pads, etc.Sensors generally operate by heat, position, air flow, oxygen or radio signal. If one changes the position of the sensor, why should it be expected to work? Sensors are not some universally adaptable device. They’re precision units that require careful positioning and calibration.
Just playing devil’s advocate. But I’ve seen enough to know this is no-win situation from a litigation standpoint.
Property grounded and shielded electronics are immune to that kind of interference.Some cheaply made sparkplugs can generate RF that can cause electrical interference. I'd go with another argument
OP probably needs longer sway bar links.Okay. Pretend I’m Ford’s lawyer. Here’s my argument.
The anti sway bar disconnect will add an extra few inches of wheel articulation when disconnected. It was engineered to release and connect on level surfaces under the exact stresses and geometries afforded by the factory suspension. The user intentionally changed those stressors and geometry when they lifted the vehicle. They used non-OES/OEM parts that are not specifically approved by Ford to work with the Sta-bar system.
How can you argue against that?
There are manual sway bar disconnects made for this exact reason.
I understand, but just because you change one thing about a system, doesn't mean that it will cause failures across the system.Sensors generally operate by heat, position, air flow, oxygen or radio signal. If one changes the position of the sensor, why should it be expected to work? Sensors are not some universally adaptable device. They’re precision units that require careful positioning and calibration.
Just playing devil’s advocate. But I’ve seen enough to know this is no-win situation from a litigation standpoint.
Exhibit A:Okay. Pretend I’m Ford’s lawyer. Here’s my argument.
The anti sway bar disconnect will add an extra few inches of wheel articulation when disconnected. It was engineered to release and connect on level surfaces under the exact stresses and geometries afforded by the factory suspension. The user intentionally changed those stressors and geometry when they lifted the vehicle. They used non-OES/OEM parts that are not specifically approved by Ford to work with the Sta-bar system.
How can you argue against that?
There are manual sway bar disconnects made for this exact reason.