I still find it confusing the amount of reference the Raptor gets from the pro IFS crowd when they all didn’t want a full size bronco because it would be too wide.
The ranger raptor has around 10” of wheel travel and for many that maybe more than they will ever need. But the only way to get more is to get longer upper and lowers and extended axles essentially putting it at a full size raptor.
We don’t know what the body is going to be like on the new bronco but if it were a current model vehicle you would have to replace bumpers and fenders to clear larger tires. The cost to go long travel IFS that the aftermarket is ready to support is so much higher than an SFA lift when all components are included.
Not a technical comment but more an observation. Am I wrong?
The ranger raptor has around 10” of wheel travel and for many that maybe more than they will ever need. But the only way to get more is to get longer upper and lowers and extended axles essentially putting it at a full size raptor.
We don’t know what the body is going to be like on the new bronco but if it were a current model vehicle you would have to replace bumpers and fenders to clear larger tires. The cost to go long travel IFS that the aftermarket is ready to support is so much higher than an SFA lift when all components are included.
Not a technical comment but more an observation. Am I wrong?
Sponsored