Man, what a cluster...
Never could I have imagined that Ford would get so much so wrong.
Never could I have imagined that Ford would get so much so wrong.
Sponsored
It says “new rear top”, not the old one.The letter from David Johnson states that this only applies to Broncos built between January 28, 2021 and July 21, 2021. The Service Action states that delivered vehicles will have the top roof PANELS and REAR QUARTER GLASS replaced. It appears that the rear top will not be replaced.
Yes, they will be producing less Broncos with these parts. Should make room to continue production of the parts to meet the known demand starting end of December.Stockpile parts they can’t enough of now?
3 works for me!What's absolutely mental to me for fellow Dirt Mountaineers is how poorly they are addressing units built and just sitting around.
Why you would choose 4 I have no idea. It's honestly the worst solution to this I think they could have come up with?
- If it's cosmetic only, like they say, give us an option to waive Ford liability and accept a bad QC roof at which point FMC is out = Money Saved
- If you can't waive liability like that (not a Lawyer so who knows...?) send the jank MIC, and charge me freight on the new one you're giving me anyways = Money Neutral
- Offer to toss on a soft top and refund MIC, if I want one later I'll buy one = Probably money lost due to the labor required off the line
- Run around with heads cut off trying to make tops like crazy and let 2k Broncos sit around while our customers get increasingly annoyed = Money assuredly wasted
You cannot sign away gross negligence. That is what would happen if you sell a part that you were well aware of being defective, and there is an injury to person or property due to said defective part.What's absolutely mental to me for fellow Dirt Mountaineers is how poorly they are addressing units built and just sitting around.
Why you would choose 4 I have no idea. It's honestly the worst solution to this I think they could have come up with?
- If it's cosmetic only, like they say, give us an option to waive Ford liability and accept a bad QC roof at which point FMC is out = Money Saved
- If you can't waive liability like that (not a Lawyer so who knows...?) send the jank MIC, and charge me freight on the new one you're giving me anyways = Money Neutral
- Offer to toss on a soft top and refund MIC, if I want one later I'll buy one = Probably money lost due to the labor required off the line
- Run around with heads cut off trying to make tops like crazy and let 2k Broncos sit around while our customers get increasingly annoyed = Money assuredly wasted
It's not gross negligence if it's "purely cosmetic".You cannot sign away gross negligence. That is what would happen if you sell a part that you were well aware of being defective, and there is an injury to person or property due to said defective part.
Amen!!!!Price protection for all with orders prior to March 19th!! Really!! I ordered on April 7th and now “I” have to pay for others/your mistakes? WTF FoMoCo
You would be surprised at what kind of injury claim a good lawyer could construe from "purely cosmetic."It's not gross negligence if it's "purely cosmetic".
I'd like to know why "purely cosmetic" on a $1000 roof is gonna cause my $50k build to sit outside in Michigan for 2 full seasons unmoved. Be a lot more "purely cosmetic" wear on the whole vehicle after than if they just send me the damn thing now...
So they either don't want to, or are lying.