400 miles on my Bronco but I believe my engine is in the affected window. For all we know the window is all Broncos as time will tell what the true affected range is.
Sponsored
They're too busy responding in a thread about someone complaining about fuel mileage.
Is it possible you contaminated the engine with any wax?So similar story to all the other ones here, car ordered in Jan 21, 4dr Black Diamond, October build, delivered early November, car has 1700 miles - Driving in a highway, racket starts, manage to pull over, wouldn't restart.
Dealer called, dropped valve, engine replacement needed.
I was on the road, so car is at a dealer about 30 miles from my house, that has been very nice, but i don't know at all.
So what are the options that people have been following? I did place a call to Customer Service, but they will take a few days to follow up.
I have owned a lot of cars, and this has never happened to me before - so advise welcome.
Thanks
L
Of course, the famous quote is ”there are lies, damn lies, and then there are statistics.” One of my statistics classes used a text called How to Lie With Statistics, which the point was, don’t use fancy statistical methods to misrepresent the meaning of data. That may have been something SG was doing. Actually, she wasn’t doing that because she really had no data. But I thought it was interesting that she was taking a stab at it. Private companies and public agencies use statistical methods to accept something that was supplied to them, i.e., to make final purchasing decisions. But they have the advantage of clear, precise data. We really don’t have that here. So failing that, emotion takes over and we all get justifiably pissed off because, as you say, we’re shelling out $50k for a car that might become inoperable. FWIW, I’d be way beyond pissed off. And i bet Ford is pissed off that the faulty valves slipped through their statistical quality control procedures! Maybe they could use SG’s help.The reality is that all of the statistical analysis, while interesting, is meaningless to the customer that shelled $50+k for a new car, which is now inoperable.
in addition you don’t know how long it will be and at best you might get some reliable Kia rental, and all because of a basic mechanical failure. This is not the turbos, or the electronic modules, or chips, it’s a valve, part of the basic engine design since engines they were invented.
I 100% agree. Obviously Ford has many controls and I am sure some heads are rolling somewhere. Regardless of statistics, these are operational risks, and thus cost money, and while unlikely they will cost sales, they are surely providing unwanted noise. The key here is how the handle this. Early 2000s I had a Range Rover that, as expected, had some issues, nothing catastrophic though. Car was bought back, new one delivered, they even decked it out with options and Customer Service handled everything in an exceptional manner, and they have now a life long customer. Now that I think about it, wasn't that when Ford owned Land Rover....Of course, the famous quote is ”there are lies, damn lies, and then there are statistics.” One of my statistics classes used a text called How to Lie With Statistics, which the point was, don’t use fancy statistical methods to misrepresent the meaning of data. That may have been something SG was doing. Actually, she wasn’t doing that because she really had no data. But I thought it was interesting that she was taking a stab at it. Private companies and public agencies use statistical methods to accept something that was supplied to them, i.e., to make final purchasing decisions. But they have the advantage of clear, precise data. We really don’t have that here. So failing that, emotion takes over and we all get justifiably pissed off because, as you say, we’re shelling out $50k for a car that might become inoperable. FWIW, I’d be way beyond pissed off. And i bet Ford is pissed off that the faulty valves slipped through their statistical quality control procedures! Maybe they could use SG’s help.
I'm 21-195 on my 2.7 and have 4200 miles....Maybe we got a good week lol400 miles on my Bronco but I believe my engine is in the affected window. For all we know the window is all Broncos as time will tell what the true affected range is.
It took Ford a while to admit, but there is a long list of engine failure issues since 2015 on new platforms.Yes- this! No one has said this is a catastrophic failure rate- yet. But there is enough with the number of blown 2.7’s on this forum alone to be a little concerned and investigate further. Ford ain’t going to tell us shit- this would be a PR nightmare for them to own another debacle in the bronco release. It’s probably going to take a serious accident/lawsuit to get them to publicly do anything.
My hope is that they are working on this behind the scenes and that it is a narrow date range of affected motors. But I guess some on here don’t want to know anything for sure- good or bad- and just put fingers in their ears while we discuss potential issues. If that’s the case, there are lots of threads about fun topics for you to dine on.
Do you have the list you can post?It took Ford a while to admit, but there is a long list of engine failure issues since 2015 on new platforms.
Who has said this? Got an example?The engineering groups at Ford are much smarter than the general public, they understand their products. Why do people think the factory is just a bunch of inbreds with hammers banging on engine blocks?
Heres a short list of the top of my head that I can remember, most on the performance/truck side. I wont list the awesome unfixable DCT trans in the Focus, I got one of those too.Do you have the list you can post?
Happy to report that I made it home safe. Considered having it towed and calling an Uber, but most 2.7s blow around 2000 miles so I probably have another 500 reliable miles.Get the hell off this forum and enjoy your meal with your family... Your chicken fingers are getting cold!
Webasto? LOLResearch the valve supplier issue............it will make sense then..........not acceptable, but you will have context.