that is...interesting. Don't know that I've ever seen it's like before. Anything else constructed like that?Found some insight here:
https://www.caranddriver.com/featur...ge-iron-in-its-aluminum-intensive-2015-f-150/
Sponsored
that is...interesting. Don't know that I've ever seen it's like before. Anything else constructed like that?Found some insight here:
https://www.caranddriver.com/featur...ge-iron-in-its-aluminum-intensive-2015-f-150/
Full breakdown of the NanoHasn't Ford made multiple variants of the 3.0 by now ...
This seems unecessarily conflicting.
Get a 2.7 from a wrecked F-150, bore it to 4.0 and adjust the stroke however you need to instead. That way you start with the port injection already there.So the current plan is that I'll get the 2.7 (if that's the biggest) I'll also get a 3.0 motor from a wrecked ST. Next I'll bore it to a 4.0, use the port/ fuel injection of the 2.7, get bigger turbos, and be around 600hp on pump fuel... on second thought, my wife might kill me if I tear apart our brand new Bronco...
I don’t think with the nano you will be able to get past 3.3L with out really risking blowing up.Get a 2.7 from a wrecked F-150, bore it to 4.0 and adjust the stroke however you need to instead. That way you start with the port injection already there.
At that point, you're not tearing up the new Bronco, because you're not removing any parts, thus "preserving the integrity of the factory engine" by doing the engine swap.
according to the spec sheet for the 2020 Ford Explorer the 3.0 is only DI.I recall both the 2.7 and the 3.0 being PFDI, but I'm trying to find some documents to back it up. I'm currently on vacation and don't have my work laptop, so I can't really go digging. I can update you next week when I'm back home. But everything else you said is spot on.
Then I think @BuckedOff-Road is SOL with his (yep, assuming gender) plan anyway, since the 3.0L the same case and head as the 2.7L.I don’t think with the nano you will be able to get past 3.3L with out really risking blowing up.
You can bore the 3.5 to a 4.2Then I think @BuckedOff-Road is SOL with his (yep, assuming gender) plan anyway, since the 3.0L the same case and head as the 2.7L.
Maybe he can pull the 3.5L out of a wrecked F-150 Raptor and bore it out to 4.0?
I was going to try to see if you can tell by the fuel rails but um... good luck finding those in this mess >.<Yeah I know the Dragon and Maverick engines are DI only and the Duratec, Coyote, and Nano engines are all PFDI. The 2.7 and 3.0 are so similar that I have a hard time believing the 2.7 would be PFDI and the 3.0 DI only, especially when the 3.0 is the "premium" version of the Nano. But I can't confirm until next week.
Also, don't always believe those spec sheets. They are written by marketing people who wouldn't know a DAMB from an RFF from a pushrod.
definitely not to scale hereYeah I'd have to see a long block outside of the vehicle to be sure.
Also, I wouldn't be so sure about your last statement:
Yeah I'd have to see a long block outside of the vehicle to be sure.
Also, I wouldn't be so sure about your last statement:
it is to scale.definitely not to scale here
Need a Windsor motor in there for a compare-o.Yeah I'd have to see a long block outside of the vehicle to be sure.
Also, I wouldn't be so sure about your last statement:
Need a Windsor motor in there for a compare-o.