- First Name
- Yvon
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2021
- Threads
- 0
- Messages
- 7
- Reaction score
- 3
- Location
- John Kennedy ford Jenkintown
- Vehicle(s)
- Ford bronco
- Your Bronco Model
- Big Bend
I want to know What's going on to ford company,something is not right.
Sponsored
There is exactly this situation. By the new allocation formula, Granger will only be given enough 2022 allocation to cover orders for reservations the first couple days after the reveal. And 2023 would cover the rest of July and part of August. Anyone with time stamps after Mid-August could be looking at 2024 or 2025 or even 2026.I feel for you all and it's shitty that you all are in this situation.
Ford should, and likely will, find a way to take care the customers with orders while also disincentivizing other dealerships from attempting the same discount model. I don't think there is a scenario where current, early, order holder are pushed into 2023, unless there is another supply chain issue.
100% correct. I’ve done this with Jeep three times, each time from a small dealership that does a large Wrangler volume.I did. Works fine when ordering a Jeep. I just need to decide on a color today and I'll have an order in for a "limited supply" 392 Rubicon. Easy peasy. I didn't have to ask about allocations, supply chain, current order book, etc. I may have to wait a couple of months for delivery.
This is 100% a Ford issue that's driven by some archaic good ol' boys dealer network and they are loosing thousands of customers over it. I'm sure they take the attitude that it doesn't matter, we'll still sell every Bronco we build. My answer to that is what comes around goes around and if you treat customers like crap, intentionally or not, there is an impact at some point.
How exactly would buying a bunch of bronco sports teach Ford a lesson? The only way they MIGHT learn a lesson is if a lot of reservation holders bought Jeeps or Toyota’s or some other brand. How is putting more money in their pocket going to teach them anything?Ford's new allocation formula bases 25% of allocation on Bronco Sport sales. This is completely unfair of Ford to not have told dealers this sooner. While Zach at Granger and other small dealers were selling Escapes and Explorers and F-150s to their customers, they could have been pushing them toward Sports if that's what Ford wanted.
Where I live, the Sports seem to be concentrated in the affluent areas of our metropolis. Granger is a very tiny, rural community. I doubt a ton of local folks said, Hey, let's order one of those newfangled Bronco Sports to replace our old, reliable F-150. Ford didn't tell the mom and pop dealers that they should push people toward Sports when they come in asking for an Escape.
No, Ford, likely through pressure from their good old boy dealer network, looked at what they could put in their formula that looked fair on the surface, but would make their preferred mega-dealers get all the Broncos while cutting our Stephen's and Granger and every small dealer out there.
This is comparable to how I and other teachers curve tests. We grade all the tests and plot all the scores. We look at the mean and the median. We have a lot of flexibility with how to use that data to decide of final grades for these teenagers. Nothing in our job requirements says that we have to use a certain formula for curving, but it has to be fair.
What Ford has done with there new allocation formula would be like me looking at the data and coming up with a formula for curving that looks fair, but gives A's to the kids who brought me Dutch Bros a few times this semester, and F's to the kids who wore NY Yankee logos on their shirts (I grew up going to Fenway Park).
Ford looked at the data and said, what can we put in the formula that looks fair, but will undercut Stephen's and Granger. "Oh, look," Ford excitedly says. "Granger and Stephen's sell a lot of F-150s, so we can't let that be part of the formula, but ooh, lookie, yay, neither of them has a ton of Sports sales. Let's put THAT in the formula!"
It is my hope that somehow in the next month or so Granger and Stephen's both sell a record number of Bronco Sports. If I had a ton of expendable income, I would buy 1000 Sports from each of them just to prove to Ford that in this modern hyper-connected world, they need to change their sales model, not try to force consumers into buying their product from their preferred, albeit unscrupulous dealers.
Anybody know some altruist billionaires who want to buy a few thousand Bronco Sports?
I wasn't trying to teach Ford a lesson, I was trying to get Granger more allocation to stick it to the other fat cat dealers who obviously complained to Ford about Granger and Stephen's.How exactly would buying a bunch of bronco sports teach Ford a lesson? The only way they MIGHT learn a lesson is if a lot of reservation holders bought Jeeps or Toyota’s or some other brand. How is putting more money in their pocket going to teach them anything?
No, we only know for certain the number of vehicles we will receive in the first month. Production will certainly vary based upon microchips, etc. That is why I put such a large range on our estimate.@Zach@Granger Is it safe to say most dealers should know their start up production allocation number for my22 already? So if we were to ask before Wednesday they should know?
I'll ride a bicycle with two flat tires before I give someone a $10,000 ADM.I think Ford is underestimating how many people will buy a Jeep before they will buy a Bronco at 5-figure ADM.
Why wouldnt Ford want 1500 happy customers from one dealer all across the United States? A good buying experience leads to less nit picking as far as problems. A bad buying experience hurts the dealers and it hurts Ford.First, let's stop with the free market nonsense. This is a price controlled product being sold through a licensed dealer network...there is no "free market" in this scenario.
Second, call it what you want, but certain dealers actively sought to switch reservations to their dealership, away from others, specifically by offering the lowest prices in the country. They peppered internet forums with these deals and promotions. To pretend otherwise is to ignore the past 18 months of forum posts. Their goal was to sell a shit ton of low priced cars, acting as a discount dealer, rather than fewer higher priced cars. I'm not mad at them for trying, but apparently many folks (decision makers) disagreed with their model and tactics and it backfired. I can see why Ford wouldn't want their vehicles to be commoditized with a "race to the bottom" pricing strategy.
We aren't talking Ford competing against Chevy or Dodge, this was Ford competing against other Ford dealers. I wouldn't be surprised if price floors are put into place to prevent this in the future. Many other dealer networks do this.
Thanks!No, we only know for certain the number of vehicles we will receive in the first month. Production will certainly vary based upon microchips, etc. That is why I put such a large range on our estimate.
And most mfgrs just want to move their product and don't care a whit about who and how. I've got clients in that, always fighting for fair pricing when the huge dealers get favored treatment. Sticking it to Granger makes as much sense as not communicating with us about where our damned Broncos are.....they need an actual pr department.Why wouldnt Ford want 1500 happy customers from one dealer all across the United States? A good buying experience leads to less nit picking as far as problems. A bad buying experience hurts the dealers and it hurts Ford.