- Thread starter
- #61
His son likes cougars.Why bring back Mercury?? They were the Buick's of Ford
Can't blame 'em, I let myself be chased by a few back in my youth.
Sponsored
His son likes cougars.Why bring back Mercury?? They were the Buick's of Ford
So did I, amazing sex, even if they were a bit crazyHis son likes cougars.
Can't blame 'em, I let myself be chased by a few back in my youth.
I like the Mercury emblem, the front waterfall grill and the interior treatment (Lincolns were too gaudy and baseline Fords are OK, just not the same as a Mercury). For example, the Mariner is so much more refined than the Escape (imho). I just think Mercury gave people that middle ground that doesn't exist anymore. I also think Ford could have made Mercury into a different segement than Ford or Lincoln (make it the car, wagon and sports car brand). Maybe I am just nostalgic about the brand. And I certainly would not equate Mercury to Buick.Why bring back Mercury?? They were the Buick's of Ford
His favorite car ever is a 69 Mercury Cougar Eliminator. I told him to wait 25 years and he will be able to buy them for a dime a dozen.His son likes cougars.
Can't blame 'em, I let myself be chased by a few back in my youth.
Yeah but gas will be hard to find.His favorite car ever is a 69 Mercury Cougar Eliminator. I told him to wait 25 years and he will be able to buy them for a dime a dozen.
My mom's cousin had a Mercury, I'd love a Cyclone personally, though whats stopping them from remaking a more refined version Mustang and making it a Lincoln Cougar?His favorite car ever is a 69 Mercury Cougar Eliminator. I told him to wait 25 years and he will be able to buy them for a dime a dozen.
Honest question because I don't know: Does Ford have a manual transmission that can handle the GT500's torque output right now? Because if not, the development dollars for that would be a reason why.I can understand why they did not offer it as an option. Because then they would have been selling performance wise sub-par GT500s, and they did not want those out there. They wanted every GT500 to be top tier. and also consistent.
you will also likely never see me own a GT500, not cause I can't afford one, but because for my toys I like them to be sticks. I'd rather a GT350 over the GT500. if the mach 1 comes out next year I'll be ordering one of those though, and it will be a stick. My 2dr bronco will be a stick, or I won't be getting one. 4dr bronco will likely be auto though.
that is a sweet car. I still remember the first time I ran across one of those, at a Manchac Mustang, a mustang junkyard and repair shop near me, around 1998.His favorite car ever is a 69 Mercury Cougar Eliminator. I told him to wait 25 years and he will be able to buy them for a dime a dozen.
probably, but maybe not with enough of a safety margin for them to be comfortable with it.Honest question because I don't know: Does Ford have a manual transmission that can handle the GT500's torque output right now? Because if not, the development dollars for that would be a reason why.
Regardless if I was choosing I'd take the GT350 over the 500. I'll take the lighter car with the flat plane crank.
No it won'tYeah but gas will be hard to find.
Nothing, but I think Ford lost a lot of heritage when Mercury died. How am I gonna buy me a Mercury and cruise up and down this a road (see Steve Miller Band)My mom's cousin had a Mercury, I'd love a Cyclone personally, though whats stopping them from remaking a more refined version Mustang and making it a Lincoln Cougar?
When did it get to be an old person brand like Buick now is my questionNothing, but I think Ford lost a lot of heritage when Mercury died. How am I gonna buy me a Mercury and cruise up and down this a road (see Steve Miller Band)
Who said it was an old person brand? My wife would be offended.When did it get to be an old person brand like Buick now is my question
I only notice older folks in them, except for an occasional cougar coupeWho said it was an old person brand? My wife would be offended.