Hard to tell for sure, but looking at the catalog pictures, it almost looks like the Braptor has an additional clutch plate maybe…?Makes me wonder what changes are made and what “higher capacity” means
Braptor one on top
Sponsored
Hard to tell for sure, but looking at the catalog pictures, it almost looks like the Braptor has an additional clutch plate maybe…?Makes me wonder what changes are made and what “higher capacity” means
And of course Ford has no consistency in orientation for the parts displayedHard to tell for sure, but looking at the catalog pictures, it almost looks like the Braptor has an additional clutch plate maybe…?
Braptor one on top
![]()
![]()
This needs to become a thing!!!Machine shop time?
So you ordered a Braptor clutch?Clutch showed up today that we’ll install without any modification. This will maybe give us an opportunity to see if there’s a noticeable difference between oem and modded clutch.
The friction paper coverage on each plate is pretty thin compared to what we could have on there. Talked to Suncoast and when the new plates are coated they’ll maximize the contact area. That is, if we use the OEM plates. After looking at the setup they’re going to ask a third party their thoughts on making all new friction plates and we’ll go with whatever setup is going to have the most grip/strength.
There is some space available but without having the case apart and looking at how the clutch engages with the system I’m not certain we’ll be able to get any additional plates in there.
![]()
![]()
![]()
I did not. These are both normal clutches. Didn’t find out about braptor clutch being different until the help from this thread. Not sure if it would show up in time for me to actually do anything with it so I’ll just try to see what I can with these ones.So you ordered a Braptor clutch?
While you got the case apart can you measure the diameter of the planet gear on the low range portion? Here is a H3 4:1 for comparison...also tooth count on big ring?Clutch people decided a carbon friction paper would be the best material for our use. I didn’t get an opportunity to ask why.
Unfortunately it won’t show up in time to get installed so we have a few months before getting it in there.
Brand new friction plate with OEM coating-![]()
New coating applied to maximize available contact-![]()
We’ll see if it makes a difference!
It will be awhile before we have it apart but I’ll try. At least two months.While you got the case apart can you measure the diameter of the planet gear on the low range portion? Here is a H3 4:1 for comparison...also tooth count on big ring?
![]()
Last time I looked into this, which was literally 25 years ago, the guys that were doing that with Toyotas and the isuzu's transfer cases and were building them have multiple ratios and super low range Etc... we're all doing it with gear driven ones... no chains.I've been watching a lot of Toyota videos lately and they've got me wondering - is the Bronco case constructed in such a way that it would be possible to run multiple reduction stages with the right adapter?
What overall drive ratios are you guys shooting for? With the Advanced 4x4 transfer case and 4.7 axle a stock Bronco has 80:1 with a manual in crawler and 70:1 with the automatic in tenth gear, which I think is M2. That's an awful lot of torque even with a 2.3L.I have a 93 Toyota setup like that, with a 4.7 "Trail creeper" and a stock 2.23 transfer case.. (Chevy 4.3 motor, th350 trans, 4.10 d60 axles) honestly, it makes for a fragile drive line, and I only use the 4.7 reduction in really gnarly spots, and with great care..
I can't see taking a 6g Bronco anywhere you could use that kind of gearing (yet!), and by the time we are taking them places like that, hopefully someone like advanced adapters will be making crawl boxes for them..
extreme low gears helped with pulling out my Peterbilt! I was literally smoking all four tires on dry pavement and it finally came freeWhat overall drive ratios are you guys shooting for? With the Advanced 4x4 transfer case and 4.7 axle a stock Bronco has 80:1 with a manual in crawler and 70:1 with the automatic in tenth gear, which I think is M2. That's an awful lot of torque even with a 2.3L.
Or are you just trying to go slower? I'm not trying to debate you. I'm just trying to understand. After all, a Unimog can get ridiculously low, 100:1 and lower.
For me, that's what it's all about - just creepin' along. Arguably more important in a manual than an auto. I've seen these double Toyotas with ratios well over 200:1 and a triple truck with a 580:1 that you could start in gear and watch it inch along at idle.Or are you just trying to go slower?