It wasn’t but it still had 35s and bunch of other stuff that add weight. So my point is what’s the difference.There were Sas + racks on 2 doors 2.3l, not sure about the 4 doors, not sure overland concept was Sas, was it?
Sponsored
It wasn’t but it still had 35s and bunch of other stuff that add weight. So my point is what’s the difference.There were Sas + racks on 2 doors 2.3l, not sure about the 4 doors, not sure overland concept was Sas, was it?
The smaller engine would appear to be the difference. The rack can be added to 4 door builds that have the 2.3 engine.It wasn’t but it still had 35s and bunch of other stuff that add weight. So my point is what’s the difference.
The OP appears to be from FL, not CA. Fortunately, Florida doesn’t have such a crazy system of taxing vehicles based on Value... it’s based on weight/class.You can buy from the dealer and install yourself, as with all accessories ordered before delivery you will be paying more for yearly DMV registration and insurance because they will increase the vehicles cost up front. Adding a bunch of accessories later will save you $ every year In lower reg fees. Only advantage to putting them on up front is if you lack the cash to add them after delivery.
The roof is not made of metal, unlike the original BroncoIf this is weight related, how on earth will they be able to sustain a metal modular roof? Surely that is heavier than the roof rack!
How would a static roof load not be "available?" Wouldn't it say the roof rack would not be available? I've read that document and never have seen that statement.Look at the last line of this document. It is from 7/24/20. 9 days after the reveal.
I don’t know. I saved this pdf on 7/24. I’m not the engineer on the project.How would a static roof load not be "available?" Wouldn't it say the roof rack would not be available? I've read that document and never have seen that statement.
Look at The Wrangler.....the only rack you see are those aftermarket exoskeleton racks by Gobi....that’s probably an indication of the limitations you see for the BroncoHow would a static roof load not be "available?" Wouldn't it say the roof rack would not be available? I've read that document and never have seen that statement.
I just want to read it. I see lots of sasquatch Broncos on Ford's website that have roof racks on them. Thanks for sharing it, even though it makes me sad. I think they should have been a lot more specific about it instead of hiding it on a pdf somewhere. I tried to find that info on the website, but I can't find it.I don’t know. I saved this pdf on 7/24. I’m not the engineer on the project.
Wait, is the modular roof going to be molded, also?The roof is not made of metal, unlike the original Bronco
From what I can tell through B&P all that stuff is available if you build a 2 door. Once you go to 4 door it's not.So, this is on the Ford website.
the 4 door has five seats instead of the 2-door's 4, that is the weight of an extra human being off that number, say they use 175lbs for each person, that is 875lbs, leaving 495lbs, maybe twice as much cargo space in 4 door as 2 door? call it 50lbs of gear per person fully loaded (because just a wild ass guess as I don't know the formula Ford uses, but 250lbs of cargo is, to my mind, very conservative for what they would design an off-road truck with aimed at heading out in the wilderness with ice chest/food, and gear). that gets you to 245 lbs left. Rack weighs maybe 80lbs (another guess), but will hold up to 110lbs dynamic load, for GVWR rating that is an additional 190lbs so now you are at 55lbs left. The maximum payload, is that calculated with the base small diffs and basic 4wd or the heavier diffs, steel bumpers, and Sasquatch wheels/tires? Might be a couple hundred pounds there as well.The 4 door has a 1,370 pound payload. I don't see how a roof rack pushes you over. Especially considering how many other weird things are in the b&p.